From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751973AbWCJKPJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2006 05:15:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751976AbWCJKPI (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2006 05:15:08 -0500 Received: from mailhub.sw.ru ([195.214.233.200]:35340 "EHLO relay.sw.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751973AbWCJKPH (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2006 05:15:07 -0500 Message-ID: <441152C0.2030501@sw.ru> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:19:44 +0300 From: Kirill Korotaev User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ru-RU; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030426 X-Accept-Language: ru-ru, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Hansen CC: "Eric W. Biederman" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , serue@us.ibm.com, frankeh@watson.ibm.com, clg@fr.ibm.com Subject: Re: sysctls inside containers References: <43F9E411.1060305@sw.ru> <1141062132.8697.161.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1141442246.9274.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1141442246.9274.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On another note, after messing with putting data in the init_task for > these things, I'm a little more convinced that we aren't going to want > to clutter up the task_struct with all kinds of containerized resources, > _plus_ make all of the interfaces to share or unshare each of those. > That global 'struct container' is looking a bit more attractive. BTW, Dave, have you noticed that ipc/mqueue.c uses netlink to send messages? This essentially means that they are tied as well... Thanks, Kirill