From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, torvalds@osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, janak@us.ibm.com,
viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, hch@lst.de, mtk-manpages@gmx.net,
ak@muc.de, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] unshare: Use rcu_assign_pointer when setting sighand
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 16:12:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <441C0741.3BC25010@tv-sign.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20060317125607.78a5dbe4.akpm@osdl.org
Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> wrote:
> >
> > Isn't it better to just replace this code with
> > 'BUG_ON(new_sigh != NULL)' ?
> >
> > It is never executed, but totally broken, afaics.
> > task_lock() has nothing to do with ->sighand changing.
> >
>
> /*
> * Unsharing of sighand for tasks created with CLONE_SIGHAND is not
> * supported yet
> */
> static int unshare_sighand(unsigned long unshare_flags, struct sighand_struct **new_sighp)
>
> It's all just a place-holder at present.
>
> If we don't plan on ever supporting unshare(CLONE_SIGHAND) we should take
> that code out and make it return EINVAL. Right now.
>
> And because we don't presently support CLONE_SIGHAND we should return
> EINVAL if it's set. Right now.
>
> And we should change sys_unshare() to reject not-understood flags. Right
> now.
>
> If we don't do these things we'll silently break 2.6.16-back-compatibility
> of applications which are coded for future kernels.
unshare_sighand() is ok, it never populates *new_sighp, it just returns
errror code: 0 when ->sighand is not shared, EINVAL otherwise.
I argued about 'if (new_sigh)' code in sys_unshare() because it lies about
locking rules.
Btw, copy_process() forbids CLONE_SIGHAND without CLONE_VM (is there a
good reason for that?), but one can do unshare(CLONE_VM). This is odd.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-18 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-16 16:49 [PATCH] unshare: Cleanup up the sys_unshare interface before we are committed Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-16 17:31 ` [PATCH] unshare: Use rcu_assign_pointer when setting sighand Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-17 6:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-03-17 17:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-03-17 20:56 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-18 13:12 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2006-03-18 15:43 ` Janak Desai
2006-03-18 17:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-03-18 17:41 ` [PATCH] for 2.6.16, disable unshare_vm() Oleg Nesterov
2006-03-18 18:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-18 18:29 ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-03-18 18:48 ` Janak Desai
2016-03-14 13:15 ` unshare(CLONE_VM) Re: [PATCH] unshare: Use rcu_assign_pointer when setting sighand Julian Smith
2016-03-14 18:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-18 13:13 ` [PATCH] implement unshare(CLONE_SIGHAND) for single-thread case Oleg Nesterov
2006-03-18 15:10 ` [PATCH] unshare: Error if passed unsupported flags Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-18 15:33 ` Janak Desai
2006-03-18 16:29 ` [PATCH] unshare: Use rcu_assign_pointer when setting sighand Janak Desai
2006-03-16 19:40 ` [PATCH] unshare: Cleanup up the sys_unshare interface before we are committed Michael Kerrisk
2006-03-16 20:33 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-16 20:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-16 21:58 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-16 22:19 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-16 21:36 ` Janak Desai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=441C0741.3BC25010@tv-sign.ru \
--to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=janak@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtk-manpages@gmx.net \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).