From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750827AbWDRNFv (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2006 09:05:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750797AbWDRNFu (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2006 09:05:50 -0400 Received: from ns1.10art-ni.co.jp ([218.223.154.218]:27034 "EHLO tenpost3.10art-ni.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750837AbWDRNFt (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2006 09:05:49 -0400 Message-ID: <4444E428.6070503@10art-ni.co.jp> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:05:44 +0900 From: "Kazuki Omo(Company)" User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Smalley Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, James Morris , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fireflier-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks References: <20060417180231.71328.qmail@web36606.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1145297742.8542.206.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> In-Reply-To: <1145297742.8542.206.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sagator-Scanner: 0.5.4-1 at tenpost3.10art-ni.co.jp; log(deliver(SpamAssassinD())) X-Sagator-id: 20060418-220546-0001-01930-JvVYrk Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, This is my first post. My name is OMO, member of LIDS development team. (LIDS is not IDS. I think the name sometime will cause misunderstanding.) Actually, LIDS is using LSM Framework from kernel-2.6.0 and keeps developing new one. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-security-module&m=113472048023966&w=2 OMO Stephen Smalley wrote: (2006/04/18 03:15): > On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 11:02 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote: > >>--- Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> >> >>>>Or, better, remove LSM itself ;) >>> >>>Seriously that makes a lot of sense. All other >>>modules people have come up >>>with over the last years are irrelevant and/or >>>broken by design. >> >>Didn't you mean "Bah!" (waves paw)? >> >>I understand the enthusiasm that the SELinux >>following demonstrates for the technology. >>I do not appreciate the bashing of alternatives. > > > Then provide a counterexample. > -- Kazuki Omo: k-omo@10art-ni.co.jp Group Manager, OSS Technology Group, Linux Technology LIDS Japanese Information: Japanese: http://www.selinux.gr.jp/LIDS-JP/index.html English: http://www.selinux.gr.jp/LIDS-JP/LIDS_en/index.html