From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
To: "Shaohua Li" <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: "Rajesh Shah" <rajesh.shah@intel.com>, "Greg KH" <greg@kroah.com>,
"arjan" <arjan@linux.intel.com>, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>,
"Tigran Aivazian" <tigran@veritas.com>,
"lkml" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]microcode update driver rewrite - takes 2
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 11:40:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44A3BC2F.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1151572535.21189.109.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
>>> Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> 29.06.06 11:15 >>>
>On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 11:03 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> I'm not having a problem removing the messages if the current state can be obtained
>> elsewhere.
>>
>> Looking at the patch I see at least one problem (in more than one place) - before
>> accessing data, you should check that the relevant piece to be read is entirely within
>> range. You should not (as done at least once) rely on copy_from_user() failing - the
>> data may be readable, but out of bounds wrt. the information in the headers (or the
>> header sizes themselves).
>Can you please give me more details? I had a lot of checks there if the
>size is incorrect.
Ah, yes, I missed the sanity checking function. That seems to take care of what I thought
was missing elsewhere.
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-29 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-27 2:51 [PATCH]microcode update driver rewrite - takes 2 Shaohua Li
2006-06-27 6:02 ` Greg KH
2006-06-27 8:15 ` Shaohua Li
2006-06-29 8:18 ` Shaohua Li
2006-06-29 9:03 ` Jan Beulich
2006-06-29 9:15 ` Shaohua Li
2006-06-29 9:40 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2006-06-27 8:15 ` Shaohua Li
2006-06-27 8:15 ` Shaohua Li
2006-06-27 17:30 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-06-28 12:16 ` Tigran Aivazian
2007-02-14 10:41 ` Alex Riesen
2006-06-27 8:14 Chuck Ebbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44A3BC2F.76E4.0078.0@novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rajesh.shah@intel.com \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=tigran@veritas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).