From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932139AbWGXNH3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 09:07:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932143AbWGXNH3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 09:07:29 -0400 Received: from sophia.inria.fr ([138.96.64.20]:23714 "EHLO sophia.inria.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932139AbWGXNH2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 09:07:28 -0400 Message-ID: <44C4C559.4090101@yahoo.fr> Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:04:25 +0200 From: Guillaume Chazarain User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060614) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Theodore Ts'o" CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Proposal and plan for ext2/3 future development work References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (sophia.inria.fr [138.96.64.20]); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:04:26 +0200 (MEST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Theodore Ts'o wrote: > 3) The ext4 code base will continue to mount older ext3 filesystems, Everybody seems enthusiastic about this plan so I must have missed something, but how will this compatibility prevent the ext4 code from looking like: 'if (ext4) { ... } else { /* ext3 */ ... }'? Regards. -- Guillaume