From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932552AbWHAJdu (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2006 05:33:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932576AbWHAJdu (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2006 05:33:50 -0400 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:45493 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932552AbWHAJdt (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2006 05:33:49 -0400 Message-ID: <44CEBD77.2060502@namesys.com> Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:33:27 -0600 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060417 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthias Andree CC: Adrian Ulrich , vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl, ipso@snappymail.ca, lkml@lpbproductions.com, jeff@garzik.org, tytso@mit.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion References: <20060731165406.GA8526@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <20060731165406.GA8526@merlin.emma.line.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Matthias Andree wrote: > >>Have you ever seen VxFS or WAFL in action? >> >> > >No I haven't. As long as they are commercial, it's not likely that I >will. > > WAFL was well done. It has several innovations that I admire, including quota trees, non-support of fragments for performance reasons, and the basic WAFL notion applied to an NFS RAID special (though important) case.