From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422700AbWHEB43 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2006 21:56:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161511AbWHEB42 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2006 21:56:28 -0400 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:1720 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1161508AbWHEB42 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2006 21:56:28 -0400 Message-ID: <44D3ECB5.1060106@namesys.com> Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 18:56:21 -0600 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060417 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Edward Shishkin CC: Matthias Andree , ric@emc.com, Alan Cox , Adrian Ulrich , "Horst H. von Brand" , bernd-schubert@gmx.de, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, jbglaw@lug-owl.de, clay.barnes@gmail.com, rudy@edsons.demon.nl, ipso@snappymail.ca, lkml@lpbproductions.com, jeff@garzik.org, tytso@mit.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion References: <200607312314.37863.bernd-schubert@gmx.de> <200608011428.k71ESIuv007094@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> <20060801165234.9448cb6f.reiser4@blinkenlights.ch> <1154446189.15540.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> <44CF9BAD.5020003@emc.com> <44CF3DE0.3010501@namesys.com> <20060803140344.GC7431@merlin.emma.line.org> <44D219F9.9080404@namesys.com> <44D231DF.1080804@namesys.com> <44D37E1B.1040109@namesys.com> In-Reply-To: <44D37E1B.1040109@namesys.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Edward Shishkin wrote: > >> >> >> How about we switch to ecc, which would help with bit rot not sector >> loss? > > > Interesting aspect. > > Yes, we can implement ECC as a special crypto transform that inflates > data. As I mentioned earlier, it is possible via translation of key > offsets with scale factor > 1. > > Of course, it is better then nothing, but anyway meta-data remains > ecc-unprotected, and, hence, robustness is not increased.. > > Edward. Would you prefer to do it as a node layout plugin instead, so as to get the metadata? Hans