linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	kpsingh@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	jolsa@kernel.org, davemarchevsky@fb.com, joannekoong@fb.com,
	geliang.tang@suse.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, duanxiongchun@bytedance.com,
	songmuchun@bytedance.com, wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com,
	cong.wang@bytedance.com, zhouchengming@bytedance.com,
	yosryahmed@google.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix some bugs in map_lookup_percpu_elem testcase
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 15:05:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44a30595-6a50-6ded-5ecc-18fd1e56abda@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80ab09cf-6072-a75a-082d-2721f6f907ef@fb.com>

在 2022/5/17 上午11:09, Yonghong Song 写道:
>
>
> On 5/15/22 7:24 PM, Feng zhou wrote:
>> From: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
>>
>> comments from Andrii Nakryiko, details in here:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220511093854.411-1-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com/T/ 
>>
>>
>> use /* */ instead of //
>> use libbpf_num_possible_cpus() instead of sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN)
>> use 8 bytes for value size
>> fix memory leak
>> use ASSERT_EQ instead of ASSERT_OK
>> add bpf_loop to fetch values on each possible CPU
>>
>> Fixes: ed7c13776e20c74486b0939a3c1de984c5efb6aa ("selftests/bpf: add 
>> test case for bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem")
>> Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
>
> LGTM with a few nits below.
> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
>
Ok, will do. Thanks.

>> ---
>>   .../bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c   | 49 +++++++++------
>>   .../bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c   | 61 ++++++++++++-------
>>   2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git 
>> a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c 
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
>> index 58b24c2112b0..89ca170f1c25 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
>> @@ -1,30 +1,39 @@
>> -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> -// Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>> +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance */
>>     #include <test_progs.h>
>
> The above empty line is unnecessary.
>
>>   #include "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.skel.h"
>>   -#define TEST_VALUE  1
>> -
>>   void test_map_lookup_percpu_elem(void)
>>   {
>>       struct test_map_lookup_percpu_elem *skel;
>> -    int key = 0, ret;
>> -    int nr_cpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
>> -    int *buf;
>> +    __u64 key = 0, sum;
>> +    int ret, i;
>> +    int nr_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
>> +    __u64 *buf;
>>   -    buf = (int *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
>> +    buf = (__u64 *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(__u64));
>>       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(buf, "malloc"))
>>           return;
>> -    memset(buf, 0, nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
>> -    buf[0] = TEST_VALUE;
>>   -    skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load();
>> -    if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, 
>> "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load"))
>> -        return;
>> +    for (i=0; i<nr_cpus; i++)
>> +        buf[i] = i;
>> +    sum = (nr_cpus-1)*nr_cpus/2;
>> +
>> +    skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open();
>> +    if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open"))
>> +        goto exit;
>> +
>> +    skel->rodata->nr_cpus = nr_cpus;
>> +
>> +    ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load(skel);
>> +    if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load"))
>> +        goto cleanup;
>> +
>>       ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach(skel);
>> -    ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach");
>> +    if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach"))
>> +        goto cleanup;
>>         ret = 
>> bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.percpu_array_map), &key, 
>> buf, 0);
>>       ASSERT_OK(ret, "percpu_array_map update");
>> @@ -37,10 +46,14 @@ void test_map_lookup_percpu_elem(void)
>>         syscall(__NR_getuid);
>>   -    ret = skel->bss->percpu_array_elem_val == TEST_VALUE &&
>> -          skel->bss->percpu_hash_elem_val == TEST_VALUE &&
>> -          skel->bss->percpu_lru_hash_elem_val == TEST_VALUE;
>> -    ASSERT_OK(!ret, "bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem success");
>> +    test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__detach(skel);
>> +
>> +    ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_array_elem_sum, sum, "percpu_array 
>> lookup percpu elem");
>> +    ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_hash_elem_sum, sum, "percpu_hash 
>> lookup percpu elem");
>> +    ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_lru_hash_elem_sum, sum, 
>> "percpu_lru_hash lookup percpu elem");
>>   +cleanup:
>>       test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__destroy(skel);
>> +exit:
>> +    free(buf);
>>   }
> [...]
>> +struct read_percpu_elem_ctx {
>> +    void *map;
>> +    __u64 sum;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int read_percpu_elem_callback(__u32 index, struct 
>> read_percpu_elem_ctx *ctx)
>> +{
>> +    __u64 key = 0;
>> +    __u64 *value;
>
> Please add an empty line here.
>
>> +    value = bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem(ctx->map, &key, index);
>> +    if (value)
>> +        ctx->sum += *value;
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
> [...]



  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-17  7:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-16  2:24 [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix some bugs in map_lookup_percpu_elem testcase Feng zhou
2022-05-17  3:09 ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-17  7:05   ` Feng Zhou [this message]
2022-05-19  0:17 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-19  3:26   ` [External] " Feng Zhou
2022-05-19  4:38     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-19  7:31       ` Feng Zhou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44a30595-6a50-6ded-5ecc-18fd1e56abda@bytedance.com \
    --to=zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davemarchevsky@fb.com \
    --cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=geliang.tang@suse.com \
    --cc=joannekoong@fb.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
    --cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).