Re: [PATCH v2] mdio_bus: suppress err message for reset gpio EPROBE_DEFER

[Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>]

Am 19.11.2020 um 22:17 schrieb Grygorii Strashko:
> 
> 
> On 19/11/2020 23:11, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> Am 19.11.2020 um 21:34 schrieb Grygorii Strashko:
>>> The mdio_bus may have dependencies from GPIO controller and so got
>>> deferred. Now it will print error message every time -EPROBE_DEFER is
>>> returned which from:
>>> __mdiobus_register()
>>>   |-devm_gpiod_get_optional()
>>> without actually identifying error code.
>>>
>>> "mdio_bus 4a101000.mdio: mii_bus 4a101000.mdio couldn't get reset GPIO"
>>>
>>> Hence, suppress error message for devm_gpiod_get_optional() returning
>>> -EPROBE_DEFER case by using dev_err_probe().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c | 6 +++---
>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c b/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c
>>> index 757e950fb745..83cd61c3dd01 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c
>>> @@ -546,10 +546,10 @@ int __mdiobus_register(struct mii_bus *bus, struct module *owner)
>>>       /* de-assert bus level PHY GPIO reset */
>>>       gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&bus->dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
>>>       if (IS_ERR(gpiod)) {
>>> -        dev_err(&bus->dev, "mii_bus %s couldn't get reset GPIO\n",
>>> -            bus->id);
>>> +        err = dev_err_probe(&bus->dev, PTR_ERR(gpiod),
>>> +                    "mii_bus %s couldn't get reset GPIO\n", bus->id);
>>
>> Doesn't checkpatch complain about line length > 80 here?
> 
> :)
> 
> commit bdc48fa11e46f867ea4d75fa59ee87a7f48be144
> Author: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> Date:   Fri May 29 16:12:21 2020 -0700
> 
>     checkpatch/coding-style: deprecate 80-column warning
> 

Ah, again something learnt. Thanks for the reference.

>>
>>>           device_del(&bus->dev);
>>> -        return PTR_ERR(gpiod);
>>> +        return err;
>>>       } else    if (gpiod) {
>>>           bus->reset_gpiod = gpiod;
>>>  
>>
>> Last but not least the net or net-next patch annotation is missing.
>> I'd be fine with treating the change as an improvement (net-next).
>>
>> Apart from that change looks good to me.
>>
>