From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C244CC636C9 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 05:10:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C7C6120A for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 05:10:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232773AbhGUE3a (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 00:29:30 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:30397 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232733AbhGUE2z (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 00:28:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1626844169; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=S+zWfy2tC40xUQfOhENAkA+DP5zrQupivowwlpIU07g=; b=OKvQMBfJdOMJzGla1xXeLHAtj4kHE/ygi2s72aJf/7lRxWF/gVycMHi7Wwj8MJKvAUnRBH 47oeUp6V4Uheu25aj9ej3rvcFZMRke6yRQZm04PVlHVFORP7/TMlcvBJ5URYCWi1WSQjwb XdEA7jKEhWxophxmjn9EX0gKAE1LNk0= Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-86-GGzom7_RPVS-YOhPZ5uxBw-1; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 01:09:27 -0400 X-MC-Unique: GGzom7_RPVS-YOhPZ5uxBw-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id p11-20020a5d59ab0000b02901526f76d738so445849wrr.0 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:09:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=S+zWfy2tC40xUQfOhENAkA+DP5zrQupivowwlpIU07g=; b=iTEuCfXZ+H4neF7bVvv++LAt1e0SmpY07jSMVPmqMN5EdxTY0//hi3rGsnvWcOKApz 3APru9sKr30Z/UyXalNaICc3Eh/MEUCCodSAgNaTzJeD0lNtrQG1UFeltnSWicm5lXvC FtzmPydJnzh18dpb8k4gh/wfbDEUEXSLfETbzby2FsqRFRlXLn7nRFrL0y8Yoq6nUPD8 AZC7dI9g7hvkbMzxcpxYzHICTyDHzUSJosj8z2JRICWT998lYHERPAcB8p3svJkJmrHY nlfPdl9x+vkAsQ5Sbu5gmLI8+kXxbFoHyiym1kiACstniAGEeq8e4TIZJo+lhyTE7B/f 957A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530uLcSMEInE7Tjz8DtHv3eeofhc2E2pAN/66/lSBD8H4mxGl+pt xkcc6qhE8+lpo/uSFk5bMc0cG4NHKWPArdPX7XdFPlRR6PzIm1HHvtn7ISN4KeXCI3RzVtyfdiM v40Nh34zQxGDSsNlHXKmIc0M7 X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c747:: with SMTP id w7mr2031957wmk.148.1626844166554; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:09:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwCxXonukubT9gJL2Rc7x0XVeUSko96/DCQuDEhTryxASNBDgCxR12O8zMwgWe3dBuGqn9kQg== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c747:: with SMTP id w7mr2031926wmk.148.1626844166269; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:09:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([92.176.231.106]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k24sm26722409wrh.30.2021.07.20.22.09.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:09:25 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] allow simple{fb, drm} drivers to be used on non-x86 EFI platforms To: Thomas Zimmermann , Ard Biesheuvel , Dave Airlie , linux-efi , David Airlie , Catalin Marinas , dri-devel , Russell King , Atish Patra , linux-riscv , Will Deacon , the arch/x86 maintainers , Ingo Molnar , Peter Robinson , Borislav Petkov , Albert Ou , Hans de Goede , Paul Walmsley , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel , Greg Kroah-Hartman , LKML , Palmer Dabbelt References: <20210625130947.1803678-1-javierm@redhat.com> <8dd26141-a09c-39e2-5174-4cad8d21c49c@suse.de> <03f0edef-e54e-8a2a-4b50-683d3d42e249@redhat.com> <37e05f02-b810-0cb1-cc4f-95711cd148d9@suse.de> From: Javier Martinez Canillas Message-ID: <44a75f18-e3a6-f764-b0ec-ce3ac05805a9@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 07:09:23 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <37e05f02-b810-0cb1-cc4f-95711cd148d9@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Thomas, On 7/20/21 8:38 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Am 20.07.21 um 15:59 schrieb Daniel Vetter: >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 03:42:45PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >>> On 7/20/21 3:01 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 09:10:52AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 04:59, Dave Airlie wrote: [snip] >>>>>> Can we just merge via drm-misc and make sure the acks are present and >>>>>> I'll deal with the fallout if any. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Fine with me. Could you stick it on a separate branch so I can double >>>>> check whether there are any issues wrt the EFI tree? >>>> >>>> It'll pop up in linux-next for integration testing or you can pick up the >>>> patch here for test-merge if you want. >>>> This is what Daniel said... >>> >>> Thanks a lot Dave and Daniel! >> >> Oh I haven't merged them, I'm assuming Thomas will do that. Just figured > > Can I simply put the patches in to drm-misc-next? There was some talk > about a topic branch? > ... which AFAIU means that there's no need for a topic branch, since the patches will be present in linux-next. And the EFI folks can use that to check if there are any integration issues or regressions caused by these. > Best regards > Thomas > Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Linux Engineering Red Hat