Dan Hecht wrote:
> Sounds good.  I don't see this in your patchset you sent yesterday
> though; did you add it after sending out those patches?

Yes.

>   if so, could you forward the new patch?  does it explicitly prevent
> stolen time from getting accounted as  user/system time or does it
> just rely on NO_HZ mode sort of happening to work that way (since the
> one shot timer is skipped ahead for missed ticks)?

Hm, not sure.  It doesn't care how often it gets called; it just
accumulates results up to that point, but I'm not sure if the time would
get double accounted.  Perhaps it doesn't matter when using
xen_sched_clock().

Did the get_scheduled_time -> sched_clock make sense to you?

    J