linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi_host: add support for request batching
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 17:54:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <461fe0cd-c5bc-a612-6013-7c002b92dcdc@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad0578b0-ce73-85ed-b67d-70c5d8176a23@acm.org>

On 30/05/19 17:36, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 5/30/19 4:28 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> +static const struct blk_mq_ops scsi_mq_ops_no_commit = {
>> +    .get_budget    = scsi_mq_get_budget,
>> +    .put_budget    = scsi_mq_put_budget,
>> +    .queue_rq    = scsi_queue_rq,
>> +    .complete    = scsi_softirq_done,
>> +    .timeout    = scsi_timeout,
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEBUG_FS
>> +    .show_rq    = scsi_show_rq,
>> +#endif
>> +    .init_request    = scsi_mq_init_request,
>> +    .exit_request    = scsi_mq_exit_request,
>> +    .initialize_rq_fn = scsi_initialize_rq,
>> +    .busy        = scsi_mq_lld_busy,
>> +    .map_queues    = scsi_map_queues,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void scsi_commit_rqs(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>> +{
>> +    struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
>> +    struct scsi_device *sdev = q->queuedata;
>> +    struct Scsi_Host *shost = sdev->host;
>> +
>> +    shost->hostt->commit_rqs(shost, hctx->queue_num);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static const struct blk_mq_ops scsi_mq_ops = {
>>       .get_budget    = scsi_mq_get_budget,
>>       .put_budget    = scsi_mq_put_budget,
>>       .queue_rq    = scsi_queue_rq,
>> +    .commit_rqs    = scsi_commit_rqs,
>>       .complete    = scsi_softirq_done,
>>       .timeout    = scsi_timeout,
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEBUG_FS
> 
> Hi Paolo,
> 
> Have you considered to modify the block layer such that a single
> scsi_mq_ops structure can be used for all SCSI LLD types?

Yes, but I don't think it's possible to do it in a nice way.
Any adjustment we make to the block layer to fit the SCSI subsystem's
desires would make all other block drivers uglier, so I chose to confine
the ugliness here.

The root issue is that the SCSI subsystem is unique in how it sits on
top of the block layer; this is the famous "adapter" (or "midlayer",
though that is confusing when talking about SCSI) design that Linux
usually tries to avoid.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-30 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-30 11:28 [PATCH 0/2] scsi: add support for request batching Paolo Bonzini
2019-05-30 11:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi_host: " Paolo Bonzini
2019-05-30 15:36   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-05-30 15:54     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2019-05-30 17:54       ` Bart Van Assche
2019-05-31  9:12         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-05-31  3:27   ` Ming Lei
2019-06-03  8:16     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-05  1:00       ` Ming Lei
2019-06-04 22:40   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-06-19  8:11   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-06-19 10:31     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-04 13:19       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-05  7:12         ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-07-05  7:44           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-07-05  7:51             ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-05-30 11:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] virtio_scsi: implement " Paolo Bonzini
2019-05-30 17:28   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-05-31  9:03     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-05  7:52   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-07-08  9:47   ` Ming Lei
2019-06-10 12:36 ` [PATCH 0/2] scsi: add support for " Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-06-26 13:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-06-26 14:14   ` Douglas Gilbert
2019-06-26 14:50     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-06-27  3:37   ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-06-27  8:17     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-05  7:13       ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-07-05 11:58         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-12  1:37           ` Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=461fe0cd-c5bc-a612-6013-7c002b92dcdc@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).