linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: David Arendt <admin@prnet.org>, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Cc: wqu@suse.com, dsterba@suse.com,
	Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Write time corrupting for log tree.
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 15:31:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <462e7bd3-d1f2-3718-fde9-77b418e9fd91@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eaf71061-548d-59d1-b8a9-fa79fd0ed9b3@prnet.org>



On 2022/12/26 15:25, David Arendt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am experiencing I similiar issue using kernel 6.1.1. The problem has 
> started in kernel 6.1. It never happend before.

6.1 kernel doesn't have that commit at all.

> 
> A btrfs scrub and a btrfs check --readonly returned 0 errors.
> 
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - BTRFS critical 
> (device sda2): corrupt leaf: root=18446744073709551610 
> block=203366612992 slot=73, bad key order, prev (484119 96 1312873) 
> current (484119 96 1312849)
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - BTRFS info 
> (device sda2): leaf 203366612992 gen 5068802 total ptrs 105 free space 
> 10820 owner 18446744073709551610
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 0 key 
> (484119 1 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09inode 
> generation 45 size 2250 mode 40700
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 1 key 
> (484119 12 484118) itemoff 16097 itemsize 26
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 2 key 
> (484119 72 15) itemoff 16089 itemsize 8
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 3 key 
> (484119 72 20) itemoff 16081 itemsize 8
> ...
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 82 key 
> (484119 96 1312873) itemoff 14665 itemsize 51
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 83 key 
> (484119 96 1312877) itemoff 14609 itemsize 56
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 84 key 
> (484128 1 0) itemoff 14449 itemsize 160
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09inode 
> generation 45 size 98304 mode 100644
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 85 key 
> (484128 108 0) itemoff 14396 itemsize 53
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data disk bytenr 10674830381056 nr 65536
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data offset 0 nr 65536 ram 65536
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 86 key 
> (484129 1 0) itemoff 14236 itemsize 160
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09inode 
> generation 45 size 26214400 mode 100644
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 87 key 
> (484129 108 589824) itemoff 14183 itemsize 53
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data disk bytenr 10665699962880 nr 32768
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data offset 0 nr 32768 ram 32768
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 88 key 
> (484129 108 2850816) itemoff 14130 itemsize 53
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data disk bytenr 10665848733696 nr 32768
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data offset 0 nr 32768 ram 32768
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 89 key 
> (484129 108 11042816) itemoff 14077 itemsize 53
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data disk bytenr 10660869349376 nr 32768
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data offset 0 nr 32768 ram 32768
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 90 key 
> (484129 108 13402112) itemoff 14024 itemsize 53
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data disk bytenr 10660207378432 nr 32768
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data offset 0 nr 32768 ram 32768
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 91 key 
> (484129 108 19628032) itemoff 13971 itemsize 53
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data disk bytenr 10665835618304 nr 32768
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data offset 0 nr 32768 ram 32768
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 92 key 
> (484129 108 21266432) itemoff 13918 itemsize 53
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data disk bytenr 10661222666240 nr 32768
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data offset 0 nr 32768 ram 32768
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 93 key 
> (484129 108 22740992) itemoff 13865 itemsize 53
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data disk bytenr 10665565814784 nr 32768
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data offset 0 nr 32768 ram 32768
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 94 key 
> (484129 108 23101440) itemoff 13812 itemsize 53
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data disk bytenr 10665836371968 nr 32768
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data offset 0 nr 32768 ram 32768
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 95 key 
> (484129 108 24084480) itemoff 13759 itemsize 53
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data disk bytenr 10665836404736 nr 32768
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data offset 0 nr 32768 ram 32768
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 96 key 
> (484129 108 24150016) itemoff 13706 itemsize 53
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data disk bytenr 10665849159680 nr 32768
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data offset 0 nr 32768 ram 32768
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 97 key 
> (484129 108 24313856) itemoff 13653 itemsize 53
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data disk bytenr 10665849192448 nr 32768
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09extent 
> data offset 0 nr 32768 ram 32768
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 98 key 
> (484147 1 0) itemoff 13493 itemsize 160
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09\x09inode 
> generation 45 size 886 mode 40755
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 99 key 
> (484147 72 4) itemoff 13485 itemsize 8
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 100 key 
> (484147 72 27) itemoff 13477 itemsize 8
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 101 key 
> (484147 72 35) itemoff 13469 itemsize 8
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 102 key 
> (484147 72 40) itemoff 13461 itemsize 8
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 103 key 
> (484147 72 45) itemoff 13453 itemsize 8
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - \x09item 104 key 
> (484147 72 52) itemoff 13445 itemsize 8
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - BTRFS error 
> (device sda2): block=203366612992 write time tree block corruption detected

And this is completely different problem from the original report.

Better to do a separate report, as the problem the original reporter is 
a purely read time error.

Furthermore, the corrupted tree block belongs to log tree, thus really 
think it's a different problem.

Adding Filipe as he is the expert on log tree.

Thanks,
Qu

> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - BTRFS: error 
> (device sda2: state AL) in free_log_tree:3284: errno=-5 IO failure
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - BTRFS info 
> (device sda2: state EAL): forced readonly
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - BTRFS warning 
> (device sda2: state EAL): Skipping commit of aborted transaction.
> 2022-12-26T07:44:45.000000+01:00 server02 kernel - - - BTRFS: error 
> (device sda2: state EAL) in cleanup_transaction:1958: errno=-5 IO failure
> 
> 
> There are no SSD access errors in the kernel logs. Smart data for the 
> SSD is normal. I also did a 12 hour memtest to rule out bad RAM.
> 
> The filesystem consists of a single 480GB SATA SSD (Corsair Neutron 
> XTI). Like for the original poster, the problems occurs only on one 
> machine.
> 
> The error appears about every few days and seems to be triggered by a 
> combination specially under high cpu utilization combined with some disk 
> IO. CPU temperature never exceeds 60 degrees.
> 
> 
> On 26/12/2022 04:29, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2022/12/26 10:47, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 5:15 AM Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot for the full kernel log.
>>>>
>>>> It indeed shows something is wrong in the run_one_delayed_ref().
>>>> But surprisingly, if there is something wrong, I'd expect more output
>>>> from btrfs, as normally if one tree block failed to pass whatever the
>>>> checks, it should cause an error message at least.
>>>>
>>>> Since you can reproduce the bug (although I don't think this is easy to
>>>> reproduce), mind to apply the extra debug patch and then try to 
>>>> reproduce?
>>>
>>> Of course I am still able to reproduce.
>>> The number of messages foreshadowing readonly has become somewhat more:
>>> [ 2295.155437] BTRFS error (device nvme0n1p3): level check failed on
>>> logical 4957418700800 mirror 1 wanted 0 found 1
>>
>> OK, indeed a level mismatch.
>>
>> From the remaining lines, it shows we're failing at 
>> do_free_extent_accounting(), which failed at the btrfs_del_csums().
>>
>> And inside btrfs_del_csums(), what we do are all regular btree 
>> operations, thus the tree level check should work without problem.
>>
>> Thus it seems to be a corrupted csum tree.
>>
>>> [ 2295.155831] BTRFS error (device nvme0n1p3: state A): Transaction
>>> aborted (error -5)
>>> [ 2295.155946] BTRFS: error (device nvme0n1p3: state A) in
>>> do_free_extent_accounting:2849: errno=-5 IO failure
>>> [ 2295.155978] BTRFS info (device nvme0n1p3: state EA): forced readonly
>>> [ 2295.155985] BTRFS error (device nvme0n1p3: state EA):
>>> run_one_delayed_ref returned -5
>>> [ 2295.156051] BTRFS: error (device nvme0n1p3: state EA) in
>>> btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2153: errno=-5 IO failure
>>>
>>> Of course full logs are also attached.
>>>
>>>> Another thing is, mind to run "btrfs check --readonly" on the fs?
>>> Result of check attached too.
>>>
>> Could you please run "btrfs check --readonly" from a liveCD?
>> There are tons of possible false alerts if ran on a RW mounted fs.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Qu
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-26  7:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-25 21:32 [6.2][regression] after commit 947a629988f191807d2d22ba63ae18259bb645c5 btrfs volume periodical forced switch to readonly after a lot of disk writes Mikhail Gavrilov
2022-12-26  0:14 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-26  2:47   ` Mikhail Gavrilov
2022-12-26  3:29     ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-26  7:25       ` David Arendt
2022-12-26  7:31         ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2023-01-03 10:41         ` Filipe Manana
2022-12-26  8:15       ` Mikhail Gavrilov
2022-12-26  8:47         ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-26 11:14           ` Mikhail Gavrilov
2022-12-26 12:11             ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-26 12:15               ` Mikhail Gavrilov
2022-12-26 23:36                 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-26 23:52                   ` Mikhail Gavrilov
2022-12-27  0:18                     ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-27  1:35                       ` Mikhail Gavrilov
2022-12-27  5:13                         ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-27 10:19                           ` Mikhail Gavrilov
2022-12-27 11:02                             ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-27 13:11                               ` Mikhail Gavrilov
2022-12-28  1:08                                 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-28 14:12                                   ` Mikhail Gavrilov
2022-12-28 23:24                                     ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-28 23:42                                       ` Mikhail Gavrilov
2022-12-29  0:00                                         ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-28 23:31                                     ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-29  0:08                                       ` Mikhail Gavrilov
2022-12-29  3:05                                         ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-26 13:37 ` [6.2][regression] after commit 947a629988f191807d2d22ba63ae18259bb645c5 btrfs volume periodical forced switch to readonly after a lot of disk writes #forregzbot Thorsten Leemhuis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=462e7bd3-d1f2-3718-fde9-77b418e9fd91@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=admin@prnet.org \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=fdmanana@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).