Re: coding style

From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: gorcunov@gmail.com
Cc: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>,
	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>,
	dave young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
	apw@shadowen.org, jschopp@austin.ibm.com
Subject: Re: coding style
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 19:43:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46742130.6010409@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070616143101.GA6579@cvg>

gorcunov@gmail.com wrote:
> [Stefan Richter - Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 03:07:43PM +0200]
> | Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> | > There sould be someting making strict rule over alignment (as it done
> | > for the tabs size).
> | 
> | That's impracticable.  Alignment, as it serves readability, cannot be
> | covered by a few strict rules.

> Yes, but C syntax (and grammar) is limited set. And alignmet I'm talking
> about may cover the following statements only:
> 
> 1) Mathematical
> 2) Logical
> 3) Function's arguments

Sure, but we have sometimes long names and long ./-> dereference
expressions.  Alignment of those after line wraps sometimes turns out
better if 'taste' rather than a simple rule is applied.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -==- =----
http://arcgraph.de/sr/