From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 5.11 new lockdep warning related to led-class code (also may involve ata / piix controller)
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 11:33:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46bcf09c-c4ac-e96b-1813-1798d36cd93d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210202093228.GA29131@amd>
Hi,
On 2/2/21 10:32 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>> Is it a regression? AFAIK it is a bug that has been there
>>> forever... My original plan was to simply wait for 5.12, so it gets
>>> full release of testing...
>>
>> It may have been a pre-existing bug which got triggered by libata
>> changes?
>
> Fixes tag suggests it is rather old.
>
>> I don't know. I almost always run all my locally build kernels with lockdep
>> enabled and as the maintainer of the vboxvideo, vboxguest and vboxsf guest
>> drivers in the mainline kernel I quite often boot local build kernels inside
>> a vm.
>>
>> So I believe that lockdep tripping over this is new in 5.11, which is why
>> I called it a regression.
>>
>> And the fix seems very safe and simple, so IMHO it would be good to get
>> this into 5.11
>
> It is in 5.11 now, and also -stable kernels. (Which suprised me a
> bit).
>
> Testing would be welcome.
I've been running my locally build kernels with this patch added for
a while now. Including inside VirtualBox where the bug triggered before.
I've not seen any bad side-effects from having this patch in my local
kernels and I can confirm that it fixes the issue which I was seeing.
Regards,
Hans
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-02 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-12 21:18 5.11 new lockdep warning related to led-class code (also may involve ata / piix controller) Hans de Goede
2021-01-12 22:30 ` Pavel Machek
2021-01-13 8:59 ` Hans de Goede
2021-01-25 13:15 ` Hans de Goede
2021-01-27 22:01 ` Pavel Machek
2021-01-28 13:02 ` Hans de Goede
2021-02-02 9:32 ` Pavel Machek
2021-02-02 10:33 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46bcf09c-c4ac-e96b-1813-1798d36cd93d@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dmurphy@ti.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).