linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
Cc: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>,
	- <devicetree-spec@vger.kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Allow restricted-dma-pool to customize IO_TLB_SEGSIZE
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 13:07:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46d9c8dd-d2dc-0d2a-aeb4-08dff9dcb733@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAFQd5AA3XCqxOSdQOOCMEdByDKRz5J9vWB0QghO2SSCqOvQBQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 2021-11-25 07:35, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Robin,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 8:59 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2021-11-23 11:21, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
>>> Default IO_TLB_SEGSIZE (128) slabs may be not enough for some use cases.
>>> This series adds support to customize io_tlb_segsize for each
>>> restricted-dma-pool.
>>>
>>> Example use case:
>>>
>>> mtk-isp drivers[1] are controlled by mtk-scp[2] and allocate memory through
>>> mtk-scp. In order to use the noncontiguous DMA API[3], we need to use
>>> the swiotlb pool. mtk-scp needs to allocate memory with 2560 slabs.
>>> mtk-isp drivers also needs to allocate memory with 200+ slabs. Both are
>>> larger than the default IO_TLB_SEGSIZE (128) slabs.
>>
>> Are drivers really doing streaming DMA mappings that large? If so, that
>> seems like it might be worth trying to address in its own right for the
>> sake of efficiency - allocating ~5MB of memory twice and copying it back
>> and forth doesn't sound like the ideal thing to do.
>>
>> If it's really about coherent DMA buffer allocation, I thought the plan
>> was that devices which expect to use a significant amount and/or size of
>> coherent buffers would continue to use a shared-dma-pool for that? It's
>> still what the binding implies. My understanding was that
>> swiotlb_alloc() is mostly just a fallback for the sake of drivers which
>> mostly do streaming DMA but may allocate a handful of pages worth of
>> coherent buffers here and there. Certainly looking at the mtk_scp
>> driver, that seems like it shouldn't be going anywhere near SWIOTLB at all.
> 
> First, thanks a lot for taking a look at this patch series.
> 
> The drivers would do streaming DMA within a reserved region that is
> the only memory accessible to them for security reasons. This seems to
> exactly match the definition of the restricted pool as merged
> recently.

Huh? Of the drivers indicated, the SCP driver is doing nothing but 
coherent allocations, and I'm not entirely sure what those ISP driver 
patches are supposed to be doing but I suspect it's probably just buffer 
allocation too. I don't see any actual streaming DMA anywhere :/

> The new dma_alloc_noncontiguous() API would allow allocating suitable
> memory directly from the pool, which would eliminate the need to copy.

Can you clarify what's being copied, and where? I'm not all that 
familiar with the media APIs, but I thought it was all based around 
preallocated DMA buffers (the whole dedicated "videobuf" thing)? The few 
instances of actual streaming DMA I can see in drivers/media/ look to be 
mostly PCI drivers mapping private descriptors, whereas the MTK ISP 
appears to be entirely register-based.

> However, for a restricted pool, this would exercise the SWIOTLB
> allocator, which currently suffers from the limitation as described by
> Hsin-Yi. Since the allocator in general is quite general purpose and
> already used for coherent allocations as per the current restricted
> pool implementation, I think it indeed makes sense to lift the
> limitation, rather than trying to come up with yet another thing.

No, just fix the dma_alloc_noncontiguous() fallback case to split the 
allocation into dma_max_mapping_size() chunks. *That* makes sense.

Thanks,
Robin.

> 
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
> 
>>
>> Robin.
>>
>>> [1] (not in upstream) https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/cover/20190611035344.29814-1-jungo.lin@mediatek.com/
>>> [2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
>>> [3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/cover/20210909112430.61243-1-senozhatsky@chromium.org/
>>>
>>> Hsin-Yi Wang (3):
>>>     dma: swiotlb: Allow restricted-dma-pool to customize IO_TLB_SEGSIZE
>>>     dt-bindings: Add io-tlb-segsize property for restricted-dma-pool
>>>     arm64: dts: mt8183: use restricted swiotlb for scp mem
>>>
>>>    .../reserved-memory/shared-dma-pool.yaml      |  8 +++++
>>>    .../arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi |  4 +--
>>>    include/linux/swiotlb.h                       |  1 +
>>>    kernel/dma/swiotlb.c                          | 34 ++++++++++++++-----
>>>    4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>

      reply	other threads:[~2021-12-03 13:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-23 11:21 [PATCH 0/3] Allow restricted-dma-pool to customize IO_TLB_SEGSIZE Hsin-Yi Wang
2021-11-23 11:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] dma: swiotlb: " Hsin-Yi Wang
2021-11-23 11:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: Add io-tlb-segsize property for restricted-dma-pool Hsin-Yi Wang
2021-11-23 16:34   ` Rob Herring
2021-11-23 11:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: mt8183: use restricted swiotlb for scp mem Hsin-Yi Wang
2021-11-23 11:58 ` [PATCH 0/3] Allow restricted-dma-pool to customize IO_TLB_SEGSIZE Robin Murphy
2021-11-24  3:55   ` Hsin-Yi Wang
2021-11-24 12:34     ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-25  7:35   ` Tomasz Figa
2021-12-03 13:07     ` Robin Murphy [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46d9c8dd-d2dc-0d2a-aeb4-08dff9dcb733@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree-spec@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hsinyi@chromium.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).