From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757598AbXKNM0X (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 07:26:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756845AbXKNM0D (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 07:26:03 -0500 Received: from smtpq2.groni1.gr.home.nl ([213.51.130.201]:44291 "EHLO smtpq2.groni1.gr.home.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753901AbXKNMZ7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 07:25:59 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 740 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 07:25:59 EST Message-ID: <473AE84A.4050004@keyaccess.nl> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:21:30 +0100 From: Rene Herman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Takashi Iwai CC: David Miller , rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, protasnb@gmail.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, akpm@linux-foundation.org, perex@suse.cz Subject: Re: Moderated list (Was: Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs) References: <20071114.020706.219917088.davem@davemloft.net> <473AE010.4090806@keyaccess.nl> <20071114.035657.121841024.davem@davemloft.net> <20071114.040131.110718152.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14-11-07 09:25, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Wed, 14 Nov 2007 04:01:31 -0800 (PST), > David Miller wrote: >> From: David Miller >> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 03:56:57 -0800 (PST) >> >>> The fact that it farts at me every time I post to this thread. >> See? I got another one and I have received at least 10 of the >> following over the past 2 days. >> >> That's rediculious. >> >> And because a human adds the whitelist this is always going to >> happen to someone when they start posting to the alsa list for >> the first time. > > ... if you give too many recipients in your post. That is often > really annoying thing to me, together with keeping the unrelated > subject line ;) > > I personally don't care whether it's a moderated or open list. > We chose it simply due to too bad S/N ratio at that time. So, if the > current list annoys your or many others and the list management on > vger is so good, it'd be basically a good move, of course. I'll > appreciate it. > > The only confusion would be the change of ML address, but we can do it > slowly, too. I'd love the lists at vger. Amazing spam-filtering. I'd like to request the name alsa-devel@vger.kernel.org (and alsa-user@vger.kernel.org if at all possible so we can open that one up as well) though. There wouldn't need to be a forced ML address change if Jaroslov would then just rewrite alsa-{devel,user}@alsa-project.org to vger.kernel.org same as he did for alsa-devel and does for alsa-user to @lists.sf.net. Rene.