linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>,
	Jonathan Rajotte-Julien <joraj@efficios.com>
Subject: Re: [regression] TCP_MD5SIG on established sockets
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 17:17:46 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <474095696.17969.1593551866537.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89i+b-LeaPvaaHvj0yc0mJ2qwZ0981fQHVp0+sqXYp=kdkA@mail.gmail.com>

----- On Jun 30, 2020, at 4:56 PM, Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 1:44 PM David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>>
>> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 13:39:27 -0700
>>
>> > The (C) & (B) case are certainly doable.
>> >
>> > A) case is more complex, I have no idea of breakages of various TCP
>> > stacks if a flow got SACK
>> > at some point (in 3WHS) but suddenly becomes Reno.
>>
>> I agree that C and B are the easiest to implement without having to
>> add complicated code to handle various negotiated TCP option
>> scenerios.
>>
>> It does seem to be that some entities do A, or did I misread your
>> behavioral analysis of various implementations Mathieu?
>>
>> Thanks.
> 
> Yes, another question about Mathieu cases is do determine the behavior
> of all these stacks vs :
> SACK option
> TCP TS option.

I will ask my customer's networking team to investigate these behaviors,
which will allow me to prepare a thorough reply to the questions raised
by Eric and David. I expect to have an answer within 2-3 weeks at most.

Thank you!

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-30 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-13 19:38 [regression] TC_MD5SIG on established sockets Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-05-13 19:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-05-13 19:56   ` Eric Dumazet
2020-06-29 19:43     ` [regression] TCP_MD5SIG " Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-06-29 20:47       ` Eric Dumazet
2020-06-30 19:43         ` Linus Torvalds
2020-06-30 19:52           ` Linus Torvalds
2020-06-30 20:34             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-06-30 20:39               ` Eric Dumazet
2020-06-30 20:44                 ` David Miller
2020-06-30 20:56                   ` Eric Dumazet
2020-06-30 21:17                     ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2020-06-30 21:23                       ` Eric Dumazet
2020-06-30 21:54                         ` Eric Dumazet
2020-06-30 22:07                           ` Eric Dumazet
2020-06-30 22:38                             ` Eric Dumazet
2020-06-30 23:44                               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-01  0:01                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-07-01  2:02                               ` Herbert Xu
2020-07-01  2:17                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-07-01  2:22                                   ` Herbert Xu
2020-07-01  2:30                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2020-07-01  2:39                                       ` Joe Perches
2020-07-01  2:58                                       ` Herbert Xu
2020-07-01  3:36                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2020-07-01  3:50                                           ` Herbert Xu
2020-07-01 12:19                                           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-01 15:15                                             ` Eric Dumazet
2020-07-01 17:24                             ` Eric Dumazet
2020-06-30 20:21           ` David Miller
2020-06-30 20:30             ` Eric Dumazet
2020-06-30 20:39               ` Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=474095696.17969.1593551866537.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=joraj@efficios.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ycheng@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).