linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	abelay@novell.com, lenb@kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + restore-missing-sysfs-max_cstate-attr.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 23:31:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4750E391.4060309@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4750DCDC.8030306@rtr.ca>

Mark Lord wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:44:25 -0500
>> Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca> wrote:
>>>> all you need to do in your kernel module is call
...
>> set_acceptable_latency("mark", 5);
>>
>> and to remove the constraint again you just do
>>
>> remove_acceptable_latency("mark");
..
>>> Then why not have a sysfs entry for scripts to write tsoro
>>> to trigger the exact same end result?  :)
>>
>> that's what is in current -mm pretty much
>> well not sysfs, but it goes via a file descriptor
>> (so that if the process that sets the contraint dies, the latency
>> requirement can be given up automatically)
> ...
> 
> But doesn't that approach also make it nearly impossible to script ????
...

Okay, I have a working trivial kernel module that I can load/unload
to tweak this.  But a simple sysfs attribute would be *so much* better
as a permanent kernel feature.

Binary interfaces (fd) are fine for some uses, but not nice for scripts.

Cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-01  4:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200711302153.lAULrZ7n026255@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
     [not found] ` <924EFEDD5F540B4284297C4DC59F3DEE2FAE6A@orsmsx423.amr.corp.intel.com>
2007-11-30 22:20   ` + restore-missing-sysfs-max_cstate-attr.patch added to -mm tree Andrew Morton
2007-11-30 22:37     ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-12-01  2:52       ` Mark Lord
2007-12-01  3:02         ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-01  3:14           ` Mark Lord
2007-12-01  3:18             ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-01  3:31               ` Mark Lord
2007-12-01  3:44                 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-01  3:48                   ` Mark Lord
2007-12-01  4:02                   ` Mark Lord
2007-12-01  4:31                     ` Mark Lord [this message]
2007-12-01 23:43                   ` 20000+ wake-ups/second in 2.6.24. Bug? Mark Lord
2007-12-01 23:46                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-01 23:55                       ` Mark Lord
2007-12-02  0:13                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-02  1:10                           ` Andres Freund
2007-12-02  0:20                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-04 17:29                           ` Mark Lord
2008-02-04 17:50                             ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-04 19:17                               ` Mark Lord
2007-12-02 14:41                     ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-02 14:59                       ` Mark Lord
2007-12-02 15:12                         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-02 15:45                           ` Mark Lord
2007-12-02 15:45                           ` Mark Lord
2007-12-02 15:49                           ` Mark Lord
2008-01-02 23:41                 ` + restore-missing-sysfs-max_cstate-attr.patch added to -mm tree Mark Lord
2008-01-03  0:06                   ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-01-03  0:51                     ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-03  1:12                       ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-01-03  4:25                         ` Mark Lord
2008-01-03  4:18                     ` Mark Lord
2008-01-04  2:16                       ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-01-04  3:16                         ` Mark Lord
2008-01-04 21:52                           ` Mark Lord
2008-01-04 21:59                             ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-01-05 16:27                               ` Mark Lord
2008-01-06 21:34                         ` Mark Lord
2008-01-07  7:18                           ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-07 14:07                             ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-07 15:07                               ` Mark Lord
2008-01-07 14:18                             ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-01-07 15:06                             ` Mark Lord
2008-01-07 19:12                               ` Len Brown
2008-01-07 21:33                                 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-07 22:43                                   ` Len Brown
2007-12-01 10:17             ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-01 16:30               ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-05 11:17       ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-07 21:38         ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4750E391.4060309@rtr.ca \
    --to=lkml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=abelay@novell.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).