From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4259DC388F9 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 11:09:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B955207FF for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 11:09:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=walle.cc header.i=@walle.cc header.b="Ac+d/i/k" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728484AbgKWLJb (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2020 06:09:31 -0500 Received: from ssl.serverraum.org ([176.9.125.105]:42641 "EHLO ssl.serverraum.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725806AbgKWLJa (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2020 06:09:30 -0500 Received: from ssl.serverraum.org (web.serverraum.org [172.16.0.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ssl.serverraum.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1437C22F99; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 12:09:23 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=walle.cc; s=mail2016061301; t=1606129768; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2Ueqku/JVNSF/2s8zRFoeRCB+yxaWGTNZHlXD0vl0yg=; b=Ac+d/i/ksWz/18OB3eyODgr1vHRZdVbui2nzOE7zfBcQyBcwgUh4bJjYQdBBug4O5y2WI4 C/HN77/y/dXOfoV8jAjSguqTYpDK6Jey2CBfED0xidqQSeAcqvpJmzW2pnxUZGNB+YljqD WFImC6lopFoAqkVwrZ329l/F7M6Melg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 12:09:23 +0100 From: Michael Walle To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: "Y.b. Lu" , Shawn Guo , Leo Li , Rob Herring , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Hunter , Ulf Hansson , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ashish Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ls1028a: make the eMMC and SD card controllers use fixed indices In-Reply-To: <20201120093015.duel3yx63cbya77w@skbuf> References: <20201119155025.965941-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> <20201120093015.duel3yx63cbya77w@skbuf> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.9 Message-ID: <47517939c251b1bc2f04ee1962caddf4@walle.cc> X-Sender: michael@walle.cc Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am 2020-11-20 10:30, schrieb Vladimir Oltean: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 02:04:02AM +0000, Y.b. Lu wrote: >> Hi Vladimir, >> >> I have already upstreamed a patch for all affected layerscape boards. >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shawnguo/linux.git/commit/?h=imx/dt64&id=342ab37ecaf8c1b10dd3ca9a1271db29a6af0705 >> >> Please check whether it works for you. > > Thanks, one can tell that I haven't done my due diligence of checking > Shawn's tree first. I'll cherry-pick that patch and carry on with my > work. > > However, the fact still remains that Michael has expressed his opinion > regarding mmcblk0 vs mmcblk1. Do you think that we could make the > aliases a per-board option instead of per-SoC? Consider that there > might > even be boards that only use SD card. It would be strange for the block > device in that case to be called /dev/mmcblk1. Yangbo, any news on this? I'd like to have this resorted out before it is set in stone for 5.10. -- -michael