From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754827AbXLEU1n (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:27:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752295AbXLEU1e (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:27:34 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:45407 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751617AbXLEU1d (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:27:33 -0500 Message-ID: <47570B0A.6040404@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:33:14 -0500 From: Dave Anderson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030611 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] exec: allow > 2GB executables to run on 64-bit systems References: <4756C590.9080301@redhat.com> <475702E7.1000607@redhat.com> <20071205195637.GA20595@one.firstfloor.org> In-Reply-To: <20071205195637.GA20595@one.firstfloor.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andi Kleen wrote: >>I agree in theory. We've only seen instances on 64-bitters... > > > I think that's because gcc does not support the medium/large code models > for i386. Although in theory someone could create an executable with > a large enough .data. > > -Andi Or perhaps huge debuginfo section(s)? The x86_64 instance had 2.5GB .debug_macinfo DWARF section. Dave