archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavol Cvengros <>
To: Bill Davidsen <>
Subject: Re: ICH9 & Core2 Duo - kernel crash
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:55:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Pavol Cvengros wrote:
>> On Thursday 06 December 2007 21:15:53 Bill Davidsen wrote:
>>> Pavol Cvengros wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> I am trying LKML to get some help on one linux kernel related problem.
>>>> Lately we got a machine with new HW from Intel. CPU is Intel Core2 Duo
>>>> E6850 3GHz with 2GB of RAM. Motherboard is Intel DG33BU with G33 
>>>> chipset.
>>>> After long fight with kernel crashes on different things, we 
>>>> figured out
>>>> that if the multicore is disabled in bios, everything is ok and 
>>>> machine
>>>> is running good. No kernel crashes no problems, but with one core 
>>>> only.
>>>> This small table will maybe explain:
>>>> Cores   -     kernel   -   state
>>>>    2  -   nonsmp or smp  - crash
>>>>    1  -  smp or nonsmp  - ok
>>>> All crashes have been different (swaper, rcu, irq, init.....) or we 
>>>> just
>>>> got internal gcc compiler error while compiling kernel/glibc/.... 
>>>> and the
>>>> machine was frozen.
>>>> Please can somebody advise what to do to identify that problem more
>>>> precisely. (debug kernel options?)
>>>> Our immpresion - ICH9 & ICH9R support in kernel is bad... sorry to 
>>>> say..
>>> I have seen unusual memory behavior under heavy load, in the cases I 
>>> saw
>>> it was heavy DMA load from multiple SCSI controllers, and one case with
>>> FFT on the CPU and heavy network load with gigE. Have you run 
>>> memtest on
>>> this hardware? Just a thought, but I see people running Linux on that
>>> chipset, if not that particular board.
>>> A cheap test even if it shows nothing. Of course it could be a CPU 
>>> cache
>>> issue in that one CPU, although that's unlikely.
>> yes, memtest was running all his tests without problems. The wierd 
>> thing is that all kernel crashes we have seen were different (as 
>> stated in original mail)....
> The problem with memtest, unless I underestimate it, is that it 
> doesn't use all core and siblings, so it doesn't quite load the memory 
> system the way regular usage would. Needless to say, if this does turn 
> out to be a memory loading issue I don't know of any tools to really 
> test it. I fall back on part swapping, but that only helps if it's the 
> memory DIMM itself.

right now that machine has 2 x 1GB DDR2 - 800MHz.... do you think I 
should test the machine with only one DDR? (I hope to put there 4GB all 

  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-07 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-04 12:31 ICH9 & Core2 Duo - kernel crash Pavol Cvengros
2007-12-04 14:52 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-04 15:03   ` Pavol Cvengros
2007-12-04 15:10 ` Olivér Pintér
2007-12-04 15:31   ` Pavol Cvengros
     [not found]     ` <>
2007-12-04 17:41       ` Pavol Cvengros
2007-12-06 20:15 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-12-07  6:01   ` Pavol Cvengros
2007-12-07 18:16     ` Bill Davidsen
2007-12-07 18:55       ` Pavol Cvengros [this message]
2007-12-08 16:32         ` Bill Davidsen
2007-12-08 21:38           ` Pavol Cvengros

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).