From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753631AbYAIB4X (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 20:56:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751122AbYAIB4P (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 20:56:15 -0500 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.176]:46601 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750867AbYAIB4O (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 20:56:14 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=P2n/LIOWfkg2iuOkizFs37Ggo58DSruTimYkRZP+acveahuFeF4j4hBzvn4qBMuxh7GZEQKCHyF9fVlabHakfz2C5h/VCKAg+47fXQbZPeXpcIp+cbbSHzVlgz7rCNFxtQoB0Vj1+o5vvkpqxIqedkVUn472yh7HDqUyw/f2a8I= Message-ID: <478429B2.2030002@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 10:56:02 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22J=2EA=2E_Magall=F3n=22?= CC: "Linux-Kernel, " Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.24-rc7 References: <20080108015012.2e518dd4@werewolf> In-Reply-To: <20080108015012.2e518dd4@werewolf> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org J.A. Magallón wrote: > HI all... > > On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 14:19:16 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> It's been two weeks since rc6, but let's face it, with xmas and new years >> (and birthdays) in between, there hasn't actually been a lot of working >> days, and the incremental patch from -rc6 is about half the size of the >> one from rc5->rc6. >> >> And I'll be charitable and claim it's because it's all stabilizing, and >> not because we've all been in a drunken stupor over the holidays. >> >> The shortlog (appended below) is short and fairly informative. It's all >> really just a lot of rather small changes. The diffstat shows a lot of >> one- and two-liners, with just a few drivers (and the Cell platform) >> getting a bit more attention, and the SLUB support of /proc/slabinfo >> showing up as a blip. >> > > With this kernel I'm getting frequent temporary freezes (system comes > back responsive after a minute or so...). I see this in dmesg: > > ata3.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen > ata3.00: cmd ca/00:08:67:10:18/00:00:00:00:00/e2 tag 0 dma 4096 out > res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout) > ata3.00: status: { DRDY } > ata3: soft resetting link > ata3.00: configured for UDMA/133 > ata3: EH complete > sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] 390721968 512-byte hardware sectors (200050 MB) > sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off > sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 > sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA > > ata4.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen > ata4.00: cmd c8/00:08:ef:0b:c7/00:00:00:00:00/e7 tag 0 dma 4096 in > res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout) > ata4.00: status: { DRDY } > ata4: soft resetting link > ata4.00: configured for UDMA/133 > ata4: EH complete > sd 3:0:0:0: [sdc] 625142448 512-byte hardware sectors (320073 MB) > sd 3:0:0:0: [sdc] Write Protect is off > sd 3:0:0:0: [sdc] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 > sd 3:0:0:0: [sdc] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA > > See this are two different drives, I doubt both drives have gone nuts > at the same time... That's weird. There hasn't been any related changes. Does going back to 2.6.24-rc6 fix the problem? -- tejun