From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754955AbYAVQYT (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:24:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751669AbYAVQYL (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:24:11 -0500 Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:43008 "EHLO einhorn.in-berlin.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751522AbYAVQYL (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:24:11 -0500 X-Envelope-From: stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de Message-ID: <4796189F.8070506@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:23:59 +0100 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071216 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Denys Fedoryshchenko CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc7 to 2.6.24-rc8 possible regression References: <20080121160255.M12670@visp.net.lb> <47952094.9050102@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20080122110448.M46928@visp.net.lb> In-Reply-To: <20080122110448.M46928@visp.net.lb> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote: > No, i am using vanilla kernel. It is one of production machines, and as i > know screen is not using epoll. OK, but the trace shows that it is the epoll recursion again. > I will try to apply on all my production machines this patch. Sorry if it is > related. Well, let's hope that the lockdep annotation or whatever other fix gets into mainline sooner than later. Which reminds me to test my setup again which appeared to be able to reproduce the __wake_up recursion on my command... -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--- ---= =-==- http://arcgraph.de/sr/