From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755445AbYB0RbT (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:31:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751616AbYB0RbH (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:31:07 -0500 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:54792 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751360AbYB0RbH (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:31:07 -0500 Message-ID: <47C59E53.4080701@garzik.org> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:30:59 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Rothwell CC: Andrew Morton , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 27 References: <20080227170300.25c50fe3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080226230059.58cf3cfa.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080228010626.fd4e00d2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20080228010626.fd4e00d2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.2.3 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell wrote: > But on the plus side I also have: > > libata-dev (same as git-libata-all?) Intentionally different. libata-dev.git#NEXT is for linux-next, and libata-dev.git#ALL is for -mm. Jeff