From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@samsung.com>,
Hyesoo Yu <hyesoo.yu@samsung.com>,
Janghyuck Kim <janghyuck.kim@samsung.com>,
Jinkyu Yang <jinkyu1.yang@samsung.com>,
Alex <acnwigwe@google.com>, Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>,
Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@google.com>,
Erick Reyes <erickreyes@google.com>,
"J . Avila" <elavila@google.com>,
Jonglin Lee <jonglin@google.com>,
Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@google.com>,
Thierry Strudel <tstrudel@google.com>,
Will McVicker <willmcvicker@google.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] iommu/samsung: Introduce Exynos sysmmu-v8 driver
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 10:14:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47a0abcc-b3d6-a9a3-8d3a-5689bbf8767a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPLW+4nxSDeGL-1hFzdDr3vYx+9ct8_YrXfVNgzwm1Gq2=Vh7A@mail.gmail.com>
On 2022-06-21 20:57, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 14:31, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>
>> Well, for starting point the existing exynos-iommu driver is really
>> enough. I've played a bit with newer Exyos SoCs some time ago. If I
>> remember right, if you limit the iommu functionality to the essential
>> things like mapping pages to IO-virtual space, the hardware differences
>> between SYSMMU v5 (already supported by the exynos-iommu driver) and v7
>> are just a matter of changing a one register during the initialization
>> and different bits the page fault reason decoding. You must of course
>> rely on the DMA-mapping framework and its implementation based on
>> mainline DMA-IOMMU helpers. All the code for custom iommu group(s)
>> handling or extended fault management are not needed for the initial
>> version.
>>
>
> Thanks for the advice! Just implemented some testing driver, which
> uses "Emulated Translation" registers available on SysMMU v7. That's
> one way to verify the IOMMU driver with no actual users of it. It
> works fine with vendor SysMMU driver I ported to mainline earlier, and
> now I'm trying to use it with exynos-sysmmu driver (existing
> upstream). If you're curious -- I can share the testing driver
> somewhere on GitHub.
>
> I believe the register you mentioned is PT_BASE one, so I used
> REG_V7_FLPT_BASE_VM = 0x800C instead of REG_V5_PT_BASE_PFN. But I
> didn't manage to get that far, unfortunately, as
> exynos_iommu_domain_alloc() function fails in my case, with BUG_ON()
> at this line:
>
> /* For mapping page table entries we rely on dma == phys */
> BUG_ON(handle != virt_to_phys(domain->pgtable));
>
> One possible explanation for this BUG is that "dma-ranges" property is
> not provided in DTS (which seems to be the case right now for all
> users of "samsung,exynos-sysmmu" driver). Because of that the SWIOTLB
> is used for dma_map_single() call (in exynos_iommu_domain_alloc()
> function), which in turn leads to that BUG. At least that's what
> happens in my case. The call chain looks like this:
>
> exynos_iommu_domain_alloc()
> v
> dma_map_single()
> v
> dma_map_single_attrs()
> v
> dma_map_page_attrs()
> v
> dma_direct_map_page() // dma_capable() == false
> v
> swiotlb_map()
> v
> swiotlb_tbl_map_single()
>
> And the last call of course always returns the address different than
> the address for allocated pgtable. E.g. in my case I see this:
>
> handle = 0x00000000fbfff000
> virt_to_phys(domain->pgtable) = 0x0000000880d0c000
>
> Do you know what might be the reason for that? I just wonder how the
> SysMMU driver work for all existing Exynos platforms right now. I feel
> I might be missing something, like some DMA option should be enabled
> so that SWIOTLB is not used, or something like that. Please let me
> know if you have any idea on possible cause. The vendor's SysMMU
> driver is kinda different in that regard, as it doesn't use
> dma_map_single(), so I don't see such issue there.
If this SysMMU version is capable of addressing more than 32 bits, then
exynos_iommu_probe_device() should set its DMA masks appropriately.
(as a side note since I looked, the use of PAGE_SIZE/PAGE_SHIFT in the
driver looks wrong, since I can't imagine that the hardware knows
whether Linux is using 4KB, 16KB or 64KB and adjusts itself accordingly...)
Robin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-22 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-20 20:19 [RFC 0/3] iommu/samsung: Introduce Exynos sysmmu-v8 driver Sam Protsenko
2022-01-20 20:19 ` [RFC 1/3] dt-bindings: iommu: Add bindings for samsung,sysmmu-v8 Sam Protsenko
2022-01-21 8:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-01-20 20:19 ` [RFC 2/3] iommu/samsung: Introduce Exynos sysmmu-v8 driver Sam Protsenko
2022-01-21 8:40 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-01-21 11:08 ` Sam Protsenko
2022-01-21 12:31 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-06-21 19:57 ` Sam Protsenko
2022-06-22 9:14 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2022-06-22 9:57 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-07-02 21:50 ` Sam Protsenko
2022-01-20 20:19 ` [RFC 3/3] arm64: defconfig: Enable sysmmu-v8 IOMMU Sam Protsenko
2022-01-21 8:35 ` [RFC 0/3] iommu/samsung: Introduce Exynos sysmmu-v8 driver Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47a0abcc-b3d6-a9a3-8d3a-5689bbf8767a@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=acnwigwe@google.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cmllamas@google.com \
--cc=danielmentz@google.com \
--cc=elavila@google.com \
--cc=erickreyes@google.com \
--cc=hyesoo.yu@samsung.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=janghyuck.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=jinkyu1.yang@samsung.com \
--cc=jonglin@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=pullip.cho@samsung.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=salyzyn@google.com \
--cc=semen.protsenko@linaro.org \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tstrudel@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willmcvicker@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).