linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
	Jamie Iles <jamie@nuviainc.com>,
	D Scott Phillips OS <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	lcherian@marvell.com, bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com,
	tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/23] x86/resctrl: Add domain offline callback for resctrl work
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 18:19:57 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47b1bfc9-1b31-d905-955d-638f3504778f@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211001160302.31189-8-james.morse@arm.com>



On 10/1/21 11:02 AM, James Morse wrote:
> Because domains are exposed to user-space via resctrl, the filesystem
> must update its state when CPU hotplug callbacks are triggered.
> 
> Some of this work is common to any architecture that would support
> resctrl, but the work is tied up with the architecture code to
> free the memory.
> 
> Move the monitor subdir removal and the cancelling of the mbm/limbo
> works into a new resctrl_offline_domain() call. These bits are not
> specific to the architecture. Grouping them in one function allows
> that code to be moved to /fs/ and re-used by another architecture.
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
>  * Removed a redundant mon_capable check
>  * Capitalisation
>  * Removed inline comment
>  * Added to the commit message
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c     | 26 ++---------------
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h |  2 --
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  include/linux/resctrl.h                |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> index 7a2c24c5652c..1dd8428df008 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> @@ -523,27 +523,8 @@ static void domain_remove_cpu(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r)
>  
>  	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &d->cpu_mask);
>  	if (cpumask_empty(&d->cpu_mask)) {
> -		/*
> -		 * If resctrl is mounted, remove all the
> -		 * per domain monitor data directories.
> -		 */
> -		if (static_branch_unlikely(&rdt_mon_enable_key))
> -			rmdir_mondata_subdir_allrdtgrp(r, d->id);
> +		resctrl_offline_domain(r, d);
>  		list_del(&d->list);
> -		if (r->mon_capable && is_mbm_enabled())
> -			cancel_delayed_work(&d->mbm_over);
> -		if (is_llc_occupancy_enabled() &&  has_busy_rmid(r, d)) {
> -			/*
> -			 * When a package is going down, forcefully
> -			 * decrement rmid->ebusy. There is no way to know
> -			 * that the L3 was flushed and hence may lead to
> -			 * incorrect counts in rare scenarios, but leaving
> -			 * the RMID as busy creates RMID leaks if the
> -			 * package never comes back.
> -			 */
> -			__check_limbo(d, true);
> -			cancel_delayed_work(&d->cqm_limbo);
> -		}
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * rdt_domain "d" is going to be freed below, so clear
> @@ -551,11 +532,8 @@ static void domain_remove_cpu(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r)
>  		 */
>  		if (d->plr)
>  			d->plr->d = NULL;
> -
> -		bitmap_free(d->rmid_busy_llc);
> -		kfree(d->mbm_total);
> -		kfree(d->mbm_local);
>  		domain_free(hw_dom);
> +
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index be48a682dbdb..e12b55f815bf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -522,8 +522,6 @@ void free_rmid(u32 rmid);
>  int rdt_get_mon_l3_config(struct rdt_resource *r);
>  void mon_event_count(void *info);
>  int rdtgroup_mondata_show(struct seq_file *m, void *arg);
> -void rmdir_mondata_subdir_allrdtgrp(struct rdt_resource *r,
> -				    unsigned int dom_id);
>  void mon_event_read(struct rmid_read *rr, struct rdt_resource *r,
>  		    struct rdt_domain *d, struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp,
>  		    int evtid, int first);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> index 19691f9ab061..38670bb810cb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> @@ -2499,14 +2499,12 @@ static int mon_addfile(struct kernfs_node *parent_kn, const char *name,
>   * Remove all subdirectories of mon_data of ctrl_mon groups
>   * and monitor groups with given domain id.
>   */
> -void rmdir_mondata_subdir_allrdtgrp(struct rdt_resource *r, unsigned int dom_id)
> +static void rmdir_mondata_subdir_allrdtgrp(struct rdt_resource *r,
> +					   unsigned int dom_id)
>  {
>  	struct rdtgroup *prgrp, *crgrp;
>  	char name[32];
>  
> -	if (!r->mon_capable)
> -		return;
> -
>  	list_for_each_entry(prgrp, &rdt_all_groups, rdtgroup_list) {
>  		sprintf(name, "mon_%s_%02d", r->name, dom_id);
>  		kernfs_remove_by_name(prgrp->mon.mon_data_kn, name);
> @@ -3233,6 +3231,39 @@ static int __init rdtgroup_setup_root(void)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +void resctrl_offline_domain(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&rdtgroup_mutex);

Is this really required?

> +
> +	if (!r->mon_capable)
> +		return;

I don't see the need for this check either.

Thanks
Babu

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-19 23:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-01 16:02 [PATCH v2 00/23] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read() return values in bytes James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 01/23] x86/resctrl: Free the ctrlval arrays when domain_setup_mon_state() fails James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 02/23] x86/resctrl: Fix kfree() of the wrong type in domain_add_cpu() James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 03/23] x86/resctrl: Kill off alloc_enabled James Morse
2021-10-15 22:19   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 04/23] x86/resctrl: Merge mon_capable and mon_enabled James Morse
2021-10-19 23:18   ` Babu Moger
2021-10-22 18:30     ` James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 05/23] x86/resctrl: Add domain online callback for resctrl work James Morse
2021-10-15 22:19   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-22 18:30     ` James Morse
2021-10-19 23:19   ` Babu Moger
2021-10-22 18:30     ` James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 06/23] x86/resctrl: Group struct rdt_hw_domain cleanup James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 07/23] x86/resctrl: Add domain offline callback for resctrl work James Morse
2021-10-19 23:19   ` Babu Moger [this message]
2021-10-22 18:30     ` James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 08/23] x86/resctrl: Create mba_sc configuration in the rdt_domain James Morse
2021-10-15 22:26   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-22 18:30     ` James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 09/23] x86/resctrl: Switch over to the resctrl mbps_val list James Morse
2021-10-15 22:26   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-27 16:49     ` James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 10/23] x86/resctrl: Remove architecture copy of mbps_val James Morse
2021-10-15 22:27   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-27 16:49     ` James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 11/23] x86/resctrl: Remove set_mba_sc()s control array re-initialisation James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 12/23] x86/resctrl: Abstract and use supports_mba_mbps() James Morse
2021-10-07  6:13   ` tan.shaopeng
2021-10-27 16:50     ` James Morse
2021-10-15 22:28   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 13/23] x86/resctrl: Allow update_mba_bw() to update controls directly James Morse
2021-10-15 22:28   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-27 16:49     ` James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 14/23] x86/resctrl: Calculate bandwidth from the previous __mon_event_count() chunks James Morse
2021-10-15 22:28   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-27 16:50     ` James Morse
2021-10-27 20:41       ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-29 15:50         ` James Morse
2021-10-29 22:22           ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 15/23] x86/recstrl: Add per-rmid arch private storage for overflow and chunks James Morse
2021-10-15 22:29   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 16/23] x86/recstrl: Allow per-rmid arch private storage to be reset James Morse
2021-10-07  6:16   ` tan.shaopeng
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 17/23] x86/resctrl: Abstract __rmid_read() James Morse
2021-10-15 22:29   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-19 23:20   ` Babu Moger
2021-10-20 18:15     ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-20 19:22       ` Babu Moger
2021-10-20 20:28         ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-27 16:50           ` James Morse
2021-10-27 18:59             ` Babu Moger
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 18/23] x86/resctrl: Pass the required parameters into resctrl_arch_rmid_read() James Morse
2021-10-15 22:30   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 19/23] x86/resctrl: Move mbm_overflow_count() " James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 20/23] x86/resctrl: Move get_corrected_mbm_count() " James Morse
2021-10-01 16:03 ` [PATCH v2 21/23] x86/resctrl: Rename and change the units of resctrl_cqm_threshold James Morse
2021-10-01 16:03 ` [PATCH v2 22/23] x86/resctrl: Add resctrl_rmid_realloc_limit to abstract x86's boot_cpu_data James Morse
2021-10-01 16:03 ` [PATCH v2 23/23] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read() return values in bytes James Morse
2021-10-13  2:09 ` [PATCH v2 00/23] " tan.shaopeng
2021-10-19 23:17 ` Babu Moger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47b1bfc9-1b31-d905-955d-638f3504778f@amd.com \
    --to=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jamie@nuviainc.com \
    --cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).