linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support
@ 2019-09-03  0:18 Mike Travis
  2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86/platform/uv: Save OEM_ID from ACPI MADT probe Mike Travis
                   ` (8 more replies)
  0 siblings, 9 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mike Travis @ 2019-09-03  0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov
  Cc: Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche, Steve Wahl, x86,
	linux-kernel, stable


These patches support upcoming UV systems that do not have a UV HUB.

	* Save OEM_ID from ACPI MADT probe
	* Return UV Hubless System Type
	* Add return code to UV BIOS Init function
	* Setup UV functions for Hubless UV Systems
	* Add UV Hubbed/Hubless Proc FS Files
	* Decode UVsystab Info
	* Account for UV Hubless in is_uvX_hub Ops

-- 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/8] x86/platform/uv: Save OEM_ID from ACPI MADT probe
  2019-09-03  0:18 [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support Mike Travis
@ 2019-09-03  0:18 ` Mike Travis
  2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86/platform/uv: Return UV Hubless System Type Mike Travis
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mike Travis @ 2019-09-03  0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov
  Cc: Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche, Steve Wahl, x86,
	linux-kernel, stable

[-- Attachment #1: save-oem_id --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1777 bytes --]

Save the OEM_ID and OEM_TABLE_ID passed to the apic driver probe function
for later use.  Also, convert the char list arg passed from the kernel
to a true null-terminated string.

Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c |   16 +++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
+++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
 #include <linux/reboot.h>
 #include <linux/memory.h>
 #include <linux/numa.h>
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
 
 #include <asm/uv/uv_mmrs.h>
 #include <asm/uv/uv_hub.h>
@@ -51,6 +52,10 @@ static u64			gru_dist_base, gru_first_no
 static u64			gru_dist_lmask, gru_dist_umask;
 static union uvh_apicid		uvh_apicid;
 
+/* Unpack OEM/TABLE ID's to be NULL terminated strings */
+static u8 oem_id[ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE + 1];
+static u8 oem_table_id[ACPI_OEM_TABLE_ID_SIZE + 1];
+
 /* Information derived from CPUID: */
 static struct {
 	unsigned int apicid_shift;
@@ -268,11 +273,20 @@ static void __init uv_set_apicid_hibit(v
 	}
 }
 
-static int __init uv_acpi_madt_oem_check(char *oem_id, char *oem_table_id)
+static void __init uv_stringify(int len, char *to, char *from)
+{
+	/* Relies on 'to' being NULL chars so result will be NULL terminated */
+	strncpy(to, from, len-1);
+}
+
+static int __init uv_acpi_madt_oem_check(char *_oem_id, char *_oem_table_id)
 {
 	int pnodeid;
 	int uv_apic;
 
+	uv_stringify(sizeof(oem_id), oem_id, _oem_id);
+	uv_stringify(sizeof(oem_table_id), oem_table_id, _oem_table_id);
+
 	if (strncmp(oem_id, "SGI", 3) != 0) {
 		if (strncmp(oem_id, "NSGI", 4) == 0) {
 			uv_hubless_system = true;

-- 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/8] x86/platform/uv: Return UV Hubless System Type
  2019-09-03  0:18 [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support Mike Travis
  2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86/platform/uv: Save OEM_ID from ACPI MADT probe Mike Travis
@ 2019-09-03  0:18 ` Mike Travis
  2019-09-03  6:49   ` Christoph Hellwig
  2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86/platform/uv: Add return code to UV BIOS Init function Mike Travis
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mike Travis @ 2019-09-03  0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov
  Cc: Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche, Steve Wahl, x86,
	linux-kernel, stable

[-- Attachment #1: mod-is_uv_hubless --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3568 bytes --]

Return the type of UV hubless system for UV specific code that depends
on that.  Use a define to indicate the change in arg type for this
function in uv.h.  Add a function to convert UV system type to bit
pattern needed for is_uv_hubless().

Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv.h       |   13 +++++++++++--
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c |   29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

--- linux.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv.h
+++ linux/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv.h
@@ -12,13 +12,21 @@ struct mm_struct;
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_UV
 #include <linux/efi.h>
 
+static inline int uv(int uvtype)
+{
+	/* uv(0) is "any" */
+	if (uvtype >= 0 && uvtype <= 30)
+		return 1 << uvtype;
+	return 1;
+}
 extern enum uv_system_type get_uv_system_type(void);
 static inline bool is_early_uv_system(void)
 {
 	return !((efi.uv_systab == EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR) || !efi.uv_systab);
 }
 extern int is_uv_system(void);
-extern int is_uv_hubless(void);
+extern int _is_uv_hubless(int uvtype);
+#define is_uv_hubless _is_uv_hubless
 extern void uv_cpu_init(void);
 extern void uv_nmi_init(void);
 extern void uv_system_init(void);
@@ -30,7 +38,8 @@ extern const struct cpumask *uv_flush_tl
 static inline enum uv_system_type get_uv_system_type(void) { return UV_NONE; }
 static inline bool is_early_uv_system(void)	{ return 0; }
 static inline int is_uv_system(void)	{ return 0; }
-static inline int is_uv_hubless(void)	{ return 0; }
+static inline int _is_uv_hubless(int uv) { return 0; }
+#define is_uv_hubless _is_uv_hubless
 static inline void uv_cpu_init(void)	{ }
 static inline void uv_system_init(void)	{ }
 static inline const struct cpumask *
--- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
+++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, x2apic_extra_bits);
 
 static enum uv_system_type	uv_system_type;
-static bool			uv_hubless_system;
+static int			uv_hubless_system;
 static u64			gru_start_paddr, gru_end_paddr;
 static u64			gru_dist_base, gru_first_node_paddr = -1LL, gru_last_node_paddr;
 static u64			gru_dist_lmask, gru_dist_umask;
@@ -288,11 +288,20 @@ static int __init uv_acpi_madt_oem_check
 	uv_stringify(sizeof(oem_table_id), oem_table_id, _oem_table_id);
 
 	if (strncmp(oem_id, "SGI", 3) != 0) {
-		if (strncmp(oem_id, "NSGI", 4) == 0) {
-			uv_hubless_system = true;
-			pr_info("UV: OEM IDs %s/%s, HUBLESS\n",
-				oem_id, oem_table_id);
-		}
+		if (strncmp(oem_id, "NSGI", 4) != 0)
+			return 0;
+
+		/* UV4 Hubless, CH, (0x11:UV4+Any) */
+		if (strncmp(oem_id, "NSGI4", 5) == 0)
+			uv_hubless_system = 0x11;
+
+		/* UV3 Hubless, UV300/MC990X w/o hub (0x9:UV3+Any) */
+		else
+			uv_hubless_system = 0x9;
+
+		pr_info("UV: OEM IDs %s/%s, HUBLESS(0x%x)\n",
+			oem_id, oem_table_id, uv_hubless_system);
+
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -370,11 +379,11 @@ int is_uv_system(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_uv_system);
 
-int is_uv_hubless(void)
+int _is_uv_hubless(int uvtype)
 {
-	return uv_hubless_system;
+	return (uv_hubless_system & uvtype);
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_uv_hubless);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(_is_uv_hubless);
 
 void **__uv_hub_info_list;
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__uv_hub_info_list);
@@ -1612,7 +1621,7 @@ static void __init uv_system_init_hub(vo
  */
 void __init uv_system_init(void)
 {
-	if (likely(!is_uv_system() && !is_uv_hubless()))
+	if (likely(!is_uv_system() && !is_uv_hubless(1)))
 		return;
 
 	if (is_uv_system())

-- 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/8] x86/platform/uv: Add return code to UV BIOS Init function
  2019-09-03  0:18 [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support Mike Travis
  2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86/platform/uv: Save OEM_ID from ACPI MADT probe Mike Travis
  2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86/platform/uv: Return UV Hubless System Type Mike Travis
@ 2019-09-03  0:18 ` Mike Travis
  2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86/platform/uv: Setup UV functions for Hubless UV Systems Mike Travis
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mike Travis @ 2019-09-03  0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov
  Cc: Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche, Steve Wahl, x86,
	linux-kernel, stable

[-- Attachment #1: add-bios_init-rc --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1898 bytes --]

Add a return code to the UV BIOS init function that indicates the 
successful initialization of the kernel/BIOS callback interface.

Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/uv/bios.h |    2 +-
 arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c |    9 +++++----
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- linux.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/bios.h
+++ linux/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/bios.h
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ extern s64 uv_bios_change_memprotect(u64
 extern s64 uv_bios_reserved_page_pa(u64, u64 *, u64 *, u64 *);
 extern int uv_bios_set_legacy_vga_target(bool decode, int domain, int bus);
 
-extern void uv_bios_init(void);
+extern int uv_bios_init(void);
 
 extern unsigned long sn_rtc_cycles_per_second;
 extern int uv_type;
--- linux.orig/arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c
+++ linux/arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c
@@ -182,20 +182,20 @@ int uv_bios_set_legacy_vga_target(bool d
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_bios_set_legacy_vga_target);
 
-void uv_bios_init(void)
+int uv_bios_init(void)
 {
 	uv_systab = NULL;
 	if ((efi.uv_systab == EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR) ||
 	    !efi.uv_systab || efi_runtime_disabled()) {
 		pr_crit("UV: UVsystab: missing\n");
-		return;
+		return -EEXIST;
 	}
 
 	uv_systab = ioremap(efi.uv_systab, sizeof(struct uv_systab));
 	if (!uv_systab || strncmp(uv_systab->signature, UV_SYSTAB_SIG, 4)) {
 		pr_err("UV: UVsystab: bad signature!\n");
 		iounmap(uv_systab);
-		return;
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	/* Starting with UV4 the UV systab size is variable */
@@ -206,8 +206,9 @@ void uv_bios_init(void)
 		uv_systab = ioremap(efi.uv_systab, size);
 		if (!uv_systab) {
 			pr_err("UV: UVsystab: ioremap(%d) failed!\n", size);
-			return;
+			return -EFAULT;
 		}
 	}
 	pr_info("UV: UVsystab: Revision:%x\n", uv_systab->revision);
+	return 0;
 }

-- 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/8] x86/platform/uv: Setup UV functions for Hubless UV Systems
  2019-09-03  0:18 [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support Mike Travis
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86/platform/uv: Add return code to UV BIOS Init function Mike Travis
@ 2019-09-03  0:18 ` Mike Travis
  2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86/platform/uv: Add UV Hubbed/Hubless Proc FS Files Mike Travis
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mike Travis @ 2019-09-03  0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov
  Cc: Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche, Steve Wahl, x86,
	linux-kernel, stable

[-- Attachment #1: setup-hubless-init --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1643 bytes --]

Add more support for UV systems that do not contain a UV Hub (AKA
"hubless").  This update adds support for additional functions required:

    Use PCH NMI handler instead of a UV Hub NMI handler.

    Initialize the UV BIOS callback interface used to support specific
    UV functions.

Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c |   20 +++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
+++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
@@ -1477,6 +1477,20 @@ static void __init build_socket_tables(v
 	}
 }
 
+/* Initialize UV hubless systems */
+static __init int uv_system_init_hubless(void)
+{
+	int rc;
+
+	/* Setup PCH NMI handler */
+	uv_nmi_setup_hubless();
+
+	/* Init kernel/BIOS interface */
+	rc = uv_bios_init();
+
+	return rc;
+}
+
 static void __init uv_system_init_hub(void)
 {
 	struct uv_hub_info_s hub_info = {0};
@@ -1616,8 +1630,8 @@ static void __init uv_system_init_hub(vo
 }
 
 /*
- * There is a small amount of UV specific code needed to initialize a
- * UV system that does not have a "UV HUB" (referred to as "hubless").
+ * There is a different code path needed to initialize a UV system that does
+ * not have a "UV HUB" (referred to as "hubless").
  */
 void __init uv_system_init(void)
 {
@@ -1627,7 +1641,7 @@ void __init uv_system_init(void)
 	if (is_uv_system())
 		uv_system_init_hub();
 	else
-		uv_nmi_setup_hubless();
+		uv_system_init_hubless();
 }
 
 apic_driver(apic_x2apic_uv_x);

-- 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 5/8] x86/platform/uv: Add UV Hubbed/Hubless Proc FS Files
  2019-09-03  0:18 [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support Mike Travis
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86/platform/uv: Setup UV functions for Hubless UV Systems Mike Travis
@ 2019-09-03  0:18 ` Mike Travis
  2019-09-03  6:50   ` Christoph Hellwig
  2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86/platform/uv: Decode UVsystab Info Mike Travis
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mike Travis @ 2019-09-03  0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov
  Cc: Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche, Steve Wahl, x86,
	linux-kernel, stable

[-- Attachment #1: add-procfs-files --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5164 bytes --]

Indicate to UV user utilities that UV hubless support is available on
this system via the existing /proc infterface.  The current interface
is maintained with the addition of a new /proc leaves ("hubbed" and
"hubless") that contain the specific type of UV arch this one is.

Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv.h       |    6 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c |   93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv.h
+++ linux/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv.h
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ struct mm_struct;
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_UV
 #include <linux/efi.h>
 
+#define	UV_PROC_NODE	"sgi_uv"
+
 static inline int uv(int uvtype)
 {
 	/* uv(0) is "any" */
@@ -25,6 +27,8 @@ static inline bool is_early_uv_system(vo
 	return !((efi.uv_systab == EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR) || !efi.uv_systab);
 }
 extern int is_uv_system(void);
+extern int _is_uv_hubbed(int uvtype);
+#define is_uv_hubbed _is_uv_hubbed
 extern int _is_uv_hubless(int uvtype);
 #define is_uv_hubless _is_uv_hubless
 extern void uv_cpu_init(void);
@@ -38,6 +42,8 @@ extern const struct cpumask *uv_flush_tl
 static inline enum uv_system_type get_uv_system_type(void) { return UV_NONE; }
 static inline bool is_early_uv_system(void)	{ return 0; }
 static inline int is_uv_system(void)	{ return 0; }
+static inline int _is_uv_hubbed(int uv)	{ return 0; }
+#define is_uv_hubbed _is_uv_hubbed
 static inline int _is_uv_hubless(int uv) { return 0; }
 #define is_uv_hubless _is_uv_hubless
 static inline void uv_cpu_init(void)	{ }
--- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
+++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, x2apic_extra_bits);
 
 static enum uv_system_type	uv_system_type;
+static int			uv_hubbed_system;
 static int			uv_hubless_system;
 static u64			gru_start_paddr, gru_end_paddr;
 static u64			gru_dist_base, gru_first_node_paddr = -1LL, gru_last_node_paddr;
@@ -329,6 +330,24 @@ static int __init uv_acpi_madt_oem_check
 	if (uv_hub_info->hub_revision == 0)
 		goto badbios;
 
+	switch (uv_hub_info->hub_revision) {
+	case UV4_HUB_REVISION_BASE:
+		uv_hubbed_system = 0x11;
+		break;
+
+	case UV3_HUB_REVISION_BASE:
+		uv_hubbed_system = 0x9;
+		break;
+
+	case UV2_HUB_REVISION_BASE:
+		uv_hubbed_system = 0x5;
+		break;
+
+	case UV1_HUB_REVISION_BASE:
+		uv_hubbed_system = 0x3;
+		break;
+	}
+
 	pnodeid = early_get_pnodeid();
 	early_get_apic_socketid_shift();
 
@@ -379,6 +398,12 @@ int is_uv_system(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_uv_system);
 
+int _is_uv_hubbed(int uvtype)
+{
+	return (uv_hubbed_system & uvtype);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(_is_uv_hubbed);
+
 int _is_uv_hubless(int uvtype)
 {
 	return (uv_hubless_system & uvtype);
@@ -1477,6 +1502,68 @@ static void __init build_socket_tables(v
 	}
 }
 
+/* Setup user proc fs files */
+static int proc_hubbed_show(struct seq_file *file, void *data)
+{
+	seq_printf(file, "0x%x\n", uv_hubbed_system);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int proc_hubless_show(struct seq_file *file, void *data)
+{
+	seq_printf(file, "0x%x\n", uv_hubless_system);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int proc_oemid_show(struct seq_file *file, void *data)
+{
+	seq_printf(file, "%s/%s\n", oem_id, oem_table_id);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int proc_hubbed_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+	return single_open(file, proc_hubbed_show, (void *)NULL);
+}
+
+static int proc_hubless_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+	return single_open(file, proc_hubless_show, (void *)NULL);
+}
+
+static int proc_oemid_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+	return single_open(file, proc_oemid_show, (void *)NULL);
+}
+
+/* (The open function is set to the hubbed or hubless version) */
+static struct file_operations proc_version_fops = {
+	.read		= seq_read,
+	.llseek		= seq_lseek,
+	.release	= single_release,
+};
+
+static const struct file_operations proc_oemid_fops = {
+	.open		= proc_oemid_open,
+	.read		= seq_read,
+	.llseek		= seq_lseek,
+	.release	= single_release,
+};
+
+static __init void uv_setup_proc_files(int hubless)
+{
+	struct proc_dir_entry *pde;
+	char *name = hubless ? "hubless" : "hubbed";
+
+	pde = proc_mkdir(UV_PROC_NODE, NULL);
+	proc_create(name, 0, pde, &proc_version_fops);
+	if (hubless)
+		proc_version_fops.open = proc_hubless_open;
+	else
+		proc_version_fops.open = proc_hubbed_open;
+	proc_create(name, 0, pde, &proc_oemid_fops);
+}
+
 /* Initialize UV hubless systems */
 static __init int uv_system_init_hubless(void)
 {
@@ -1488,6 +1575,10 @@ static __init int uv_system_init_hubless
 	/* Init kernel/BIOS interface */
 	rc = uv_bios_init();
 
+	/* Create user access node if UVsystab available */
+	if (rc >= 0)
+		uv_setup_proc_files(1);
+
 	return rc;
 }
 
@@ -1616,7 +1707,7 @@ static void __init uv_system_init_hub(vo
 	uv_nmi_setup();
 	uv_cpu_init();
 	uv_scir_register_cpu_notifier();
-	proc_mkdir("sgi_uv", NULL);
+	uv_setup_proc_files(0);
 
 	/* Register Legacy VGA I/O redirection handler: */
 	pci_register_set_vga_state(uv_set_vga_state);

-- 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 6/8] x86/platform/uv: Decode UVsystab Info
  2019-09-03  0:18 [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support Mike Travis
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86/platform/uv: Add UV Hubbed/Hubless Proc FS Files Mike Travis
@ 2019-09-03  0:18 ` Mike Travis
  2019-09-03  6:22   ` Greg KH
  2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86/platform/uv: Check EFI Boot to set reboot type Mike Travis
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mike Travis @ 2019-09-03  0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov
  Cc: Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche, Steve Wahl, x86,
	linux-kernel, stable

[-- Attachment #1: decode-hubless-uvst --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1313 bytes --]

Decode the hubless UVsystab passed from BIOS to the kernel saving
pertinent info in a similar manner that hubbed UVsystabs are decoded.

Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c |   16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
+++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
@@ -1323,7 +1323,8 @@ static int __init decode_uv_systab(void)
 	struct uv_systab *st;
 	int i;
 
-	if (uv_hub_info->hub_revision < UV4_HUB_REVISION_BASE)
+	/* Select only UV4 (hubbed or hubless) and higher */
+	if (is_uv_hubbed(-2) < uv(4) && is_uv_hubless(-2) < uv(4))
 		return 0;	/* No extended UVsystab required */
 
 	st = uv_systab;
@@ -1574,8 +1575,19 @@ static __init int uv_system_init_hubless
 
 	/* Init kernel/BIOS interface */
 	rc = uv_bios_init();
+	if (rc < 0) {
+		pr_err("UV: BIOS init error:%d\n", rc);
+		return rc;
+	}
+
+	/* Process UVsystab */
+	rc = decode_uv_systab();
+	if (rc < 0) {
+		pr_err("UV: UVsystab decode error:%d\n", rc);
+		return rc;
+	}
 
-	/* Create user access node if UVsystab available */
+	/* Create user access node */
 	if (rc >= 0)
 		uv_setup_proc_files(1);
 

-- 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 7/8] x86/platform/uv: Check EFI Boot to set reboot type
  2019-09-03  0:18 [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support Mike Travis
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86/platform/uv: Decode UVsystab Info Mike Travis
@ 2019-09-03  0:18 ` Mike Travis
  2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86/platform/uv: Account for UV Hubless in is_uvX_hub Ops Mike Travis
  2019-09-03  7:47 ` [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support Ingo Molnar
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mike Travis @ 2019-09-03  0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov
  Cc: Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche, Steve Wahl, x86,
	linux-kernel, stable

[-- Attachment #1: check-efi-boot --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1580 bytes --]

Change to checking for EFI Boot type from previous check on if this
is a KDUMP kernel.  This allows for KDUMP kernels that can handle
EFI reboots.

Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c |   18 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
+++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
 #include <linux/memory.h>
 #include <linux/numa.h>
 #include <linux/acpi.h>
+#include <linux/efi.h>
 
 #include <asm/uv/uv_mmrs.h>
 #include <asm/uv/uv_hub.h>
@@ -1503,6 +1504,14 @@ static void __init build_socket_tables(v
 	}
 }
 
+/* Check which reboot to use */
+static void check_efi_reboot(void)
+{
+	/* If EFI reboot not available, use ACPI reboot */
+	if (!efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT))
+		reboot_type = BOOT_ACPI;
+}
+
 /* Setup user proc fs files */
 static int proc_hubbed_show(struct seq_file *file, void *data)
 {
@@ -1591,6 +1600,8 @@ static __init int uv_system_init_hubless
 	if (rc >= 0)
 		uv_setup_proc_files(1);
 
+	check_efi_reboot();
+
 	return rc;
 }
 
@@ -1724,12 +1735,7 @@ static void __init uv_system_init_hub(vo
 	/* Register Legacy VGA I/O redirection handler: */
 	pci_register_set_vga_state(uv_set_vga_state);
 
-	/*
-	 * For a kdump kernel the reset must be BOOT_ACPI, not BOOT_EFI, as
-	 * EFI is not enabled in the kdump kernel:
-	 */
-	if (is_kdump_kernel())
-		reboot_type = BOOT_ACPI;
+	check_efi_reboot();
 }
 
 /*

-- 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 8/8] x86/platform/uv: Account for UV Hubless in is_uvX_hub Ops
  2019-09-03  0:18 [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support Mike Travis
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86/platform/uv: Check EFI Boot to set reboot type Mike Travis
@ 2019-09-03  0:18 ` Mike Travis
  2019-09-03 16:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
  2019-09-03  7:47 ` [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support Ingo Molnar
  8 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mike Travis @ 2019-09-03  0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov
  Cc: Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche, Steve Wahl, x86,
	linux-kernel, stable

[-- Attachment #1: mod-is_uvX_hub --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3069 bytes --]

The references in the is_uvX_hub() function uses the hub_info pointer
which will be NULL when the system is hubless.  This change avoids
that NULL dereference.  It is also an optimization in performance.

Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/uv/.uv_hub.h.swp |binary
 arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_hub.h |   60 ++++++++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

Binary files linux.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/.uv_hub.h.swp and linux/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/.uv_hub.h.swp differ
--- linux.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_hub.h
+++ linux/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_hub.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/topology.h>
 #include <asm/types.h>
 #include <asm/percpu.h>
+#include <asm/uv/uv.h>
 #include <asm/uv/uv_mmrs.h>
 #include <asm/uv/bios.h>
 #include <asm/irq_vectors.h>
@@ -243,83 +244,60 @@ static inline int uv_hub_info_check(int
 #define UV4_HUB_REVISION_BASE		7
 #define UV4A_HUB_REVISION_BASE		8	/* UV4 (fixed) rev 2 */
 
-#ifdef	UV1_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
 static inline int is_uv1_hub(void)
 {
-	return uv_hub_info->hub_revision < UV2_HUB_REVISION_BASE;
-}
+#ifdef	UV1_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
+	return is_uv_hubbed(uv(1));
 #else
-static inline int is_uv1_hub(void)
-{
 	return 0;
-}
 #endif
+}
 
-#ifdef	UV2_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
 static inline int is_uv2_hub(void)
 {
-	return ((uv_hub_info->hub_revision >= UV2_HUB_REVISION_BASE) &&
-		(uv_hub_info->hub_revision < UV3_HUB_REVISION_BASE));
-}
+#ifdef	UV2_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
+	return is_uv_hubbed(uv(2));
 #else
-static inline int is_uv2_hub(void)
-{
 	return 0;
-}
 #endif
+}
 
-#ifdef	UV3_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
 static inline int is_uv3_hub(void)
 {
-	return ((uv_hub_info->hub_revision >= UV3_HUB_REVISION_BASE) &&
-		(uv_hub_info->hub_revision < UV4_HUB_REVISION_BASE));
-}
+#ifdef	UV3_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
+	return is_uv_hubbed(uv(3));
 #else
-static inline int is_uv3_hub(void)
-{
 	return 0;
-}
 #endif
+}
 
 /* First test "is UV4A", then "is UV4" */
-#ifdef	UV4A_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
-static inline int is_uv4a_hub(void)
-{
-	return (uv_hub_info->hub_revision >= UV4A_HUB_REVISION_BASE);
-}
-#else
 static inline int is_uv4a_hub(void)
 {
+#ifdef	UV4A_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
+	if (is_uv_hubbed(uv(4)))
+		return (uv_hub_info->hub_revision == UV4A_HUB_REVISION_BASE);
+#endif
 	return 0;
 }
-#endif
 
-#ifdef	UV4_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
 static inline int is_uv4_hub(void)
 {
-	return uv_hub_info->hub_revision >= UV4_HUB_REVISION_BASE;
-}
+#ifdef	UV4_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
+	return is_uv_hubbed(uv(4));
 #else
-static inline int is_uv4_hub(void)
-{
 	return 0;
-}
 #endif
+}
 
 static inline int is_uvx_hub(void)
 {
-	if (uv_hub_info->hub_revision >= UV2_HUB_REVISION_BASE)
-		return uv_hub_info->hub_revision;
-
-	return 0;
+	return (is_uv_hubbed(-2) >= uv(2));
 }
 
 static inline int is_uv_hub(void)
 {
-#ifdef	UV1_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
-	return uv_hub_info->hub_revision;
-#endif
-	return is_uvx_hub();
+	return is_uv1_hub() || is_uvx_hub();
 }
 
 union uvh_apicid {

-- 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6/8] x86/platform/uv: Decode UVsystab Info
  2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86/platform/uv: Decode UVsystab Info Mike Travis
@ 2019-09-03  6:22   ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2019-09-03  6:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Travis
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov, Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche,
	Steve Wahl, x86, linux-kernel, stable

On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 07:18:21PM -0500, Mike Travis wrote:
> Decode the hubless UVsystab passed from BIOS to the kernel saving
> pertinent info in a similar manner that hubbed UVsystabs are decoded.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c |   16 ++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read:
    https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>

Same thing goes for all of the patches in this series...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/8] x86/platform/uv: Return UV Hubless System Type
  2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86/platform/uv: Return UV Hubless System Type Mike Travis
@ 2019-09-03  6:49   ` Christoph Hellwig
  2019-09-03 14:12     ` Mike Travis
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2019-09-03  6:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Travis
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov, Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche,
	Steve Wahl, x86, linux-kernel, stable

>  static inline bool is_early_uv_system(void)
>  {
>  	return !((efi.uv_systab == EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR) || !efi.uv_systab);

No need for the inner braces here.

But woudn't this be nicer as:

	return efi.uv_systab != EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR && efi.uv_systab;

anyway?

> +#define is_uv_hubless _is_uv_hubless

Why the weird macro indirection?

> -static inline int is_uv_hubless(void)	{ return 0; }
> +static inline int _is_uv_hubless(int uv) { return 0; }
> +#define is_uv_hubless _is_uv_hubless

And here again.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 5/8] x86/platform/uv: Add UV Hubbed/Hubless Proc FS Files
  2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86/platform/uv: Add UV Hubbed/Hubless Proc FS Files Mike Travis
@ 2019-09-03  6:50   ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2019-09-03  6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Travis
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov, Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche,
	Steve Wahl, x86, linux-kernel, stable

> +extern int _is_uv_hubbed(int uvtype);
> +#define is_uv_hubbed _is_uv_hubbed

> +static inline int _is_uv_hubbed(int uv)	{ return 0; }
> +#define is_uv_hubbed _is_uv_hubbed

Another two instances of these weird indirections..

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support
  2019-09-03  0:18 [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support Mike Travis
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86/platform/uv: Account for UV Hubless in is_uvX_hub Ops Mike Travis
@ 2019-09-03  7:47 ` Ingo Molnar
  2019-09-03 14:17   ` Mike Travis
  8 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2019-09-03  7:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Travis
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov, Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche,
	Steve Wahl, x86, linux-kernel, stable


* Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com> wrote:

> 
> These patches support upcoming UV systems that do not have a UV HUB.
> 
> 	* Save OEM_ID from ACPI MADT probe
> 	* Return UV Hubless System Type
> 	* Add return code to UV BIOS Init function
> 	* Setup UV functions for Hubless UV Systems
> 	* Add UV Hubbed/Hubless Proc FS Files
> 	* Decode UVsystab Info
> 	* Account for UV Hubless in is_uvX_hub Ops

Beyond addressing Christoph's feedback, please also make sure the series 
applies cleanly to tip:master, because right now it doesn't.

Thanks,

	Ingo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/8] x86/platform/uv: Return UV Hubless System Type
  2019-09-03  6:49   ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2019-09-03 14:12     ` Mike Travis
  2019-09-03 15:41       ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mike Travis @ 2019-09-03 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov, Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche,
	Steve Wahl, x86, linux-kernel, stable



On 9/2/2019 11:49 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>   static inline bool is_early_uv_system(void)
>>   {
>>   	return !((efi.uv_systab == EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR) || !efi.uv_systab);
> 
> No need for the inner braces here.
> 
> But woudn't this be nicer as:
> 
> 	return efi.uv_systab != EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR && efi.uv_systab;
> 
> anyway?

Yes, good catch.  It somehow evolved to this but your suggestion is
much more clear.
> 
>> +#define is_uv_hubless _is_uv_hubless
> 
> Why the weird macro indirection?
> 
>> -static inline int is_uv_hubless(void)	{ return 0; }
>> +static inline int _is_uv_hubless(int uv) { return 0; }
>> +#define is_uv_hubless _is_uv_hubless
> 
> And here again.
> 

Sorry, I should have explained this better.  The problem arises because
we have a number of UV specific kernel modules that support multiple
distributions.  And with back porting to earlier distros we cannot
rely on the KERNEL_VERSION macro to define whether the source is being
built for an earlier kernel.  So this allows an ifdef on the function
name to discover if the kernel is before or after these changes.

The primary motivation is to avoid referencing the hub structures
when there aren't any, thus avoiding any NULL dereferences.  (Similar
to patch 8/8.)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support
  2019-09-03  7:47 ` [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support Ingo Molnar
@ 2019-09-03 14:17   ` Mike Travis
  2019-09-05  8:19     ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mike Travis @ 2019-09-03 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov, Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche,
	Steve Wahl, x86, linux-kernel, stable



On 9/3/2019 12:47 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com> wrote:
> 
>>
>> These patches support upcoming UV systems that do not have a UV HUB.
>>
>> 	* Save OEM_ID from ACPI MADT probe
>> 	* Return UV Hubless System Type
>> 	* Add return code to UV BIOS Init function
>> 	* Setup UV functions for Hubless UV Systems
>> 	* Add UV Hubbed/Hubless Proc FS Files
>> 	* Decode UVsystab Info
>> 	* Account for UV Hubless in is_uvX_hub Ops
> 
> Beyond addressing Christoph's feedback, please also make sure the series
> applies cleanly to tip:master, because right now it doesn't.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo
> 

I will do this, and retest.  Currently we are using the latest upstream
version but obviously that thinking is flawed, since we are hoping to
get into the next merge period.

I also noticed that the MAINTAINERS list for UV is out of date, I will 
tend to that too.

Thanks,
Mike

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/8] x86/platform/uv: Return UV Hubless System Type
  2019-09-03 14:12     ` Mike Travis
@ 2019-09-03 15:41       ` Christoph Hellwig
  2019-09-03 18:49         ` Mike Travis
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2019-09-03 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Travis
  Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin,
	Andrew Morton, Borislav Petkov, Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson,
	Hedi Berriche, Steve Wahl, x86, linux-kernel, stable

On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 07:12:28AM -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
> > > +#define is_uv_hubless _is_uv_hubless
> > 
> > Why the weird macro indirection?
> > 
> > > -static inline int is_uv_hubless(void)	{ return 0; }
> > > +static inline int _is_uv_hubless(int uv) { return 0; }
> > > +#define is_uv_hubless _is_uv_hubless
> > 
> > And here again.
> > 
> 
> Sorry, I should have explained this better.  The problem arises because
> we have a number of UV specific kernel modules that support multiple
> distributions.  And with back porting to earlier distros we cannot
> rely on the KERNEL_VERSION macro to define whether the source is being
> built for an earlier kernel.  So this allows an ifdef on the function
> name to discover if the kernel is before or after these changes.

And none of these matter for upstream.  We'd rather not make the code
more convouluted than required.  If you actually really cared about these
modules you would simply submit them upstream.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 8/8] x86/platform/uv: Account for UV Hubless in is_uvX_hub Ops
  2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86/platform/uv: Account for UV Hubless in is_uvX_hub Ops Mike Travis
@ 2019-09-03 16:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
  2019-09-03 18:58     ` Mike Travis
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2019-09-03 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Travis
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov, Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche,
	Steve Wahl, x86, linux-kernel, stable

On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 07:18:23PM -0500, Mike Travis wrote:
> +#ifdef	UV1_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED

All these ifdefs are dead code, please just remove them.

Also it seems like at least the various mmr macros just check
for a specific version, I think you are much better off just
using a switch statement for the possible revisions there.

> +		return (uv_hub_info->hub_revision == UV4A_HUB_REVISION_BASE);

And none of these braces are required.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/8] x86/platform/uv: Return UV Hubless System Type
  2019-09-03 15:41       ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2019-09-03 18:49         ` Mike Travis
  2019-09-04  6:50           ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mike Travis @ 2019-09-03 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov, Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche,
	Steve Wahl, x86, linux-kernel, stable



On 9/3/2019 8:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 07:12:28AM -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
>>>> +#define is_uv_hubless _is_uv_hubless
>>>
>>> Why the weird macro indirection?
>>>
>>>> -static inline int is_uv_hubless(void)	{ return 0; }
>>>> +static inline int _is_uv_hubless(int uv) { return 0; }
>>>> +#define is_uv_hubless _is_uv_hubless
>>>
>>> And here again.
>>>
>>
>> Sorry, I should have explained this better.  The problem arises because
>> we have a number of UV specific kernel modules that support multiple
>> distributions.  And with back porting to earlier distros we cannot
>> rely on the KERNEL_VERSION macro to define whether the source is being
>> built for an earlier kernel.  So this allows an ifdef on the function
>> name to discover if the kernel is before or after these changes.
> 
> And none of these matter for upstream.  We'd rather not make the code
> more convouluted than required.  If you actually really cared about these
> modules you would simply submit them upstream.
> 

That is always being considered for everything we include into the 
community kernel source.  The problem is a couple of the kernel modules 
(hwperf being the prime example) is much more tied to hardware and 
BIOS/FW updates so has to be updated much more often than the current 
submittal/acceptance process allows.  We do opensource these modules but 
they are built from single source directories and have to be released as 
a module into a package that can be installed on different distros. 
There is not a source version for each kernel version.

I have seen this method (declare the function with a leading underscore 
and a #define for the function reference) which is why I'm assuming it's 
a standard kernel practice?  (I'll find some examples if necessary?)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 8/8] x86/platform/uv: Account for UV Hubless in is_uvX_hub Ops
  2019-09-03 16:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2019-09-03 18:58     ` Mike Travis
  2019-09-03 19:03       ` Mike Travis
  2019-09-04  6:52       ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mike Travis @ 2019-09-03 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov, Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche,
	Steve Wahl, x86, linux-kernel, stable



On 9/3/2019 9:19 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 07:18:23PM -0500, Mike Travis wrote:
>> +#ifdef	UV1_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
> 
> All these ifdefs are dead code, please just remove them.

Those ifdefs are not dead code and are being actively used.  Plus UV1 
support is dead and I think the last running system died about a year 
ago and no support or parts are available.  So undef'ing these macros 
will simplify and reduce the size of the object code.

> Also it seems like at least the various mmr macros just check
> for a specific version, I think you are much better off just
> using a switch statement for the possible revisions there.
> 
>> +		return (uv_hub_info->hub_revision == UV4A_HUB_REVISION_BASE);

The problem is those revision bases can change if a UV HUB revision 
changes.  That is why there are ranges and why I'm converting them to 
"uv_type".  Some UV kernel source code still needs to know the exact HUB 
revision, like (again) hwperf.

> 
> And none of these braces are required.
> 

Sure, I can take those out now, but usually I then get bit by 
checkpatches which then says "parenthesis's are required".

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 8/8] x86/platform/uv: Account for UV Hubless in is_uvX_hub Ops
  2019-09-03 18:58     ` Mike Travis
@ 2019-09-03 19:03       ` Mike Travis
  2019-09-04  6:52       ` Christoph Hellwig
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mike Travis @ 2019-09-03 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov, Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche,
	Steve Wahl, x86, linux-kernel, stable



On 9/3/2019 11:58 AM, Mike Travis wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/3/2019 9:19 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 07:18:23PM -0500, Mike Travis wrote:
>>> +#ifdef    UV1_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
>>
>> All these ifdefs are dead code, please just remove them.
> 
> Those ifdefs are not dead code and are being actively used.  Plus UV1 
> support is dead and I think the last running system died about a year 
> ago and no support or parts are available.  So undef'ing these macros 
> will simplify and reduce the size of the object code.

I forgot to add that if we do undef one of those "is supported" the code 
will eventually be removed, thus simplifying the source even more.  So 
including the ifdef's in the source make that code easier to find.
> 
>> Also it seems like at least the various mmr macros just check
>> for a specific version, I think you are much better off just
>> using a switch statement for the possible revisions there.
>>
>>> +        return (uv_hub_info->hub_revision == UV4A_HUB_REVISION_BASE);
> 
> The problem is those revision bases can change if a UV HUB revision 
> changes.  That is why there are ranges and why I'm converting them to 
> "uv_type".  Some UV kernel source code still needs to know the exact HUB 
> revision, like (again) hwperf.
> 
>>
>> And none of these braces are required.
>>
> 
> Sure, I can take those out now, but usually I then get bit by 
> checkpatches which then says "parenthesis's are required".

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/8] x86/platform/uv: Return UV Hubless System Type
  2019-09-03 18:49         ` Mike Travis
@ 2019-09-04  6:50           ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2019-09-04  6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Travis
  Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin,
	Andrew Morton, Borislav Petkov, Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson,
	Hedi Berriche, Steve Wahl, x86, linux-kernel, stable

On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 11:49:53AM -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
> 
> That is always being considered for everything we include into the community
> kernel source.  The problem is a couple of the kernel modules (hwperf being
> the prime example) is much more tied to hardware and BIOS/FW updates so has
> to be updated much more often than the current submittal/acceptance process
> allows.  We do opensource these modules but they are built from single
> source directories and have to be released as a module into a package that
> can be installed on different distros. There is not a source version for
> each kernel version.

Well, tought luck then.  We do not support interface for out of tree
modules only.  I actually found a few in uv and will send patches to
drop that dead weight.

> I have seen this method (declare the function with a leading underscore and
> a #define for the function reference) which is why I'm assuming it's a
> standard kernel practice?  (I'll find some examples if necessary?)

No, it isn't.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 8/8] x86/platform/uv: Account for UV Hubless in is_uvX_hub Ops
  2019-09-03 18:58     ` Mike Travis
  2019-09-03 19:03       ` Mike Travis
@ 2019-09-04  6:52       ` Christoph Hellwig
  2019-09-04 10:18         ` Mike Travis
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2019-09-04  6:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Travis
  Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin,
	Andrew Morton, Borislav Petkov, Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson,
	Hedi Berriche, Steve Wahl, x86, linux-kernel, stable

On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 11:58:49AM -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
> Those ifdefs are not dead code and are being actively used.  Plus UV1
> support is dead and I think the last running system died about a year ago
> and no support or parts are available.  So undef'ing these macros will
> simplify and reduce the size of the object code.

I'm not complaining about removing some ifdefs, that is always good.
I complain about keeping the others that are dead.  And if Hub 1 is
dead please drop all the checks and support code for it.

A patch against current mainline to show what I mean is below.

---
From e84506399fa9436d47b33491d3e38e9dc3c718c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 18:05:37 +0200
Subject: x86/uv: Remove the dead UV?_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED defines

These are always set, so remove them and the dead code for the case
where they are not defined.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_hub.h  | 38 -------------------------------
 arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_mmrs.h |  7 ------
 2 files changed, 45 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_hub.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_hub.h
index 6eed0b379412..f71eb659f0de 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_hub.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_hub.h
@@ -229,68 +229,33 @@ static inline struct uv_hub_info_s *uv_cpu_hub_info(int cpu)
 #define UV4_HUB_REVISION_BASE		7
 #define UV4A_HUB_REVISION_BASE		8	/* UV4 (fixed) rev 2 */
 
-#ifdef	UV1_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
 static inline int is_uv1_hub(void)
 {
 	return uv_hub_info->hub_revision < UV2_HUB_REVISION_BASE;
 }
-#else
-static inline int is_uv1_hub(void)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-#endif
 
-#ifdef	UV2_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
 static inline int is_uv2_hub(void)
 {
 	return ((uv_hub_info->hub_revision >= UV2_HUB_REVISION_BASE) &&
 		(uv_hub_info->hub_revision < UV3_HUB_REVISION_BASE));
 }
-#else
-static inline int is_uv2_hub(void)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-#endif
 
-#ifdef	UV3_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
 static inline int is_uv3_hub(void)
 {
 	return ((uv_hub_info->hub_revision >= UV3_HUB_REVISION_BASE) &&
 		(uv_hub_info->hub_revision < UV4_HUB_REVISION_BASE));
 }
-#else
-static inline int is_uv3_hub(void)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-#endif
 
 /* First test "is UV4A", then "is UV4" */
-#ifdef	UV4A_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
 static inline int is_uv4a_hub(void)
 {
 	return (uv_hub_info->hub_revision >= UV4A_HUB_REVISION_BASE);
 }
-#else
-static inline int is_uv4a_hub(void)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-#endif
 
-#ifdef	UV4_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
 static inline int is_uv4_hub(void)
 {
 	return uv_hub_info->hub_revision >= UV4_HUB_REVISION_BASE;
 }
-#else
-static inline int is_uv4_hub(void)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-#endif
 
 static inline int is_uvx_hub(void)
 {
@@ -302,10 +267,7 @@ static inline int is_uvx_hub(void)
 
 static inline int is_uv_hub(void)
 {
-#ifdef	UV1_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
 	return uv_hub_info->hub_revision;
-#endif
-	return is_uvx_hub();
 }
 
 union uvh_apicid {
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_mmrs.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_mmrs.h
index 62c79e26a59a..9ee5ed6e8b34 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_mmrs.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_mmrs.h
@@ -99,13 +99,6 @@
 #define UV3_HUB_PART_NUMBER_X	0x4321
 #define UV4_HUB_PART_NUMBER	0x99a1
 
-/* Compat: Indicate which UV Hubs are supported. */
-#define UV1_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED	1
-#define UV2_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED	1
-#define UV3_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED	1
-#define UV4_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED	1
-#define UV4A_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED	1
-
 /* Error function to catch undefined references */
 extern unsigned long uv_undefined(char *str);
 
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 8/8] x86/platform/uv: Account for UV Hubless in is_uvX_hub Ops
  2019-09-04  6:52       ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2019-09-04 10:18         ` Mike Travis
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mike Travis @ 2019-09-04 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov, Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche,
	Steve Wahl, x86, linux-kernel, stable

Hi Christoph,

I can do these and leave some comments as markers to find the code to 
remove later.  The real problem is uv_mmrs.h is a generated file and the 
scripts cannot be easily redone.  Basically they copy in the verilog 
definition files from the UV HUB design files and create kernel 
compatible files that also then generate run-time checking of hardware 
specifics like MMR addresses and field definitions.  The change to 
remove those "is supported defines" takes a higher level process that 
cannot be done within this short release cycle.  We are racing to 
include this support in the next linux release for pending new hardware 
introductions.

Also that script is in a state of flux for the next UV arch and 
processor updates so changing anything at this moment is highly 
disruptive.  Is there a specific reason why this UV only code that does 
not touch anything else in the kernel and only affects our productivity 
and system performance appears to be such a problem with you?  And why 
now, at this moment, and after 10 years does it suddenly seem so 
important?  I'm all for clean up but not disruption.

Bottom line, I agree to all these changes and I promise to tend to them 
in the next release cycle.  But please let us get through this cycle 
without this much chaos?

Thanks,
Mike

On 9/3/2019 11:52 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 11:58:49AM -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
>> Those ifdefs are not dead code and are being actively used.  Plus UV1
>> support is dead and I think the last running system died about a year ago
>> and no support or parts are available.  So undef'ing these macros will
>> simplify and reduce the size of the object code.
> 
> I'm not complaining about removing some ifdefs, that is always good.
> I complain about keeping the others that are dead.  And if Hub 1 is
> dead please drop all the checks and support code for it.
> 
> A patch against current mainline to show what I mean is below.
> 
> ---
>  From e84506399fa9436d47b33491d3e38e9dc3c718c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 18:05:37 +0200
> Subject: x86/uv: Remove the dead UV?_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED defines
> 
> These are always set, so remove them and the dead code for the case
> where they are not defined.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>   arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_hub.h  | 38 -------------------------------
>   arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_mmrs.h |  7 ------
>   2 files changed, 45 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_hub.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_hub.h
> index 6eed0b379412..f71eb659f0de 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_hub.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_hub.h
> @@ -229,68 +229,33 @@ static inline struct uv_hub_info_s *uv_cpu_hub_info(int cpu)
>   #define UV4_HUB_REVISION_BASE		7
>   #define UV4A_HUB_REVISION_BASE		8	/* UV4 (fixed) rev 2 */
>   
> -#ifdef	UV1_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
>   static inline int is_uv1_hub(void)
>   {
>   	return uv_hub_info->hub_revision < UV2_HUB_REVISION_BASE;
>   }
> -#else
> -static inline int is_uv1_hub(void)
> -{
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -#endif
>   
> -#ifdef	UV2_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
>   static inline int is_uv2_hub(void)
>   {
>   	return ((uv_hub_info->hub_revision >= UV2_HUB_REVISION_BASE) &&
>   		(uv_hub_info->hub_revision < UV3_HUB_REVISION_BASE));
>   }
> -#else
> -static inline int is_uv2_hub(void)
> -{
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -#endif
>   
> -#ifdef	UV3_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
>   static inline int is_uv3_hub(void)
>   {
>   	return ((uv_hub_info->hub_revision >= UV3_HUB_REVISION_BASE) &&
>   		(uv_hub_info->hub_revision < UV4_HUB_REVISION_BASE));
>   }
> -#else
> -static inline int is_uv3_hub(void)
> -{
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -#endif
>   
>   /* First test "is UV4A", then "is UV4" */
> -#ifdef	UV4A_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
>   static inline int is_uv4a_hub(void)
>   {
>   	return (uv_hub_info->hub_revision >= UV4A_HUB_REVISION_BASE);
>   }
> -#else
> -static inline int is_uv4a_hub(void)
> -{
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -#endif
>   
> -#ifdef	UV4_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
>   static inline int is_uv4_hub(void)
>   {
>   	return uv_hub_info->hub_revision >= UV4_HUB_REVISION_BASE;
>   }
> -#else
> -static inline int is_uv4_hub(void)
> -{
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -#endif
>   
>   static inline int is_uvx_hub(void)
>   {
> @@ -302,10 +267,7 @@ static inline int is_uvx_hub(void)
>   
>   static inline int is_uv_hub(void)
>   {
> -#ifdef	UV1_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED
>   	return uv_hub_info->hub_revision;
> -#endif
> -	return is_uvx_hub();
>   }
>   
>   union uvh_apicid {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_mmrs.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_mmrs.h
> index 62c79e26a59a..9ee5ed6e8b34 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_mmrs.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_mmrs.h
> @@ -99,13 +99,6 @@
>   #define UV3_HUB_PART_NUMBER_X	0x4321
>   #define UV4_HUB_PART_NUMBER	0x99a1
>   
> -/* Compat: Indicate which UV Hubs are supported. */
> -#define UV1_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED	1
> -#define UV2_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED	1
> -#define UV3_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED	1
> -#define UV4_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED	1
> -#define UV4A_HUB_IS_SUPPORTED	1
> -
>   /* Error function to catch undefined references */
>   extern unsigned long uv_undefined(char *str);
>   
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support
  2019-09-03 14:17   ` Mike Travis
@ 2019-09-05  8:19     ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2019-09-05  8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Travis
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov, Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche,
	Steve Wahl, x86, linux-kernel, stable


* Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 9/3/2019 12:47 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > These patches support upcoming UV systems that do not have a UV HUB.
> > > 
> > > 	* Save OEM_ID from ACPI MADT probe
> > > 	* Return UV Hubless System Type
> > > 	* Add return code to UV BIOS Init function
> > > 	* Setup UV functions for Hubless UV Systems
> > > 	* Add UV Hubbed/Hubless Proc FS Files
> > > 	* Decode UVsystab Info
> > > 	* Account for UV Hubless in is_uvX_hub Ops
> > 
> > Beyond addressing Christoph's feedback, please also make sure the series
> > applies cleanly to tip:master, because right now it doesn't.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > 	Ingo
> > 
> 
> I will do this, and retest.  Currently we are using the latest upstream
> version but obviously that thinking is flawed, since we are hoping to
> get into the next merge period.

You are really cutting it close timing-wise ... unless by 'next' you mean 
not v5.4 but v5.5?

> I also noticed that the MAINTAINERS list for UV is out of date, I will 
> tend to that too.

Thanks!

	Ingo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support
  2019-09-10 16:40     ` Borislav Petkov
@ 2019-09-10 16:57       ` Mike Travis
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mike Travis @ 2019-09-10 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Borislav Petkov
  Cc: Miguel Ojeda, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin,
	Andrew Morton, Christoph Hellwig, Dimitri Sivanich,
	Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche, Steve Wahl,
	maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT),
	linux-kernel, stable



On 9/10/2019 9:40 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 08:34:44AM -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
>> Hi,  I'm not conscientiously adding any attachments.  I think what is
>> happening is some email readers mistake the '---' to signify an attachment
>> follows.  I see the "staple" symbol on some indicating an attachment, but
>> not usually all of the email I send.  Thanks, Mike
> 
> Btw, is there anyway to fix your mail setup and not flood with your
> patchset?
> 
> I have received your V2 patchset 5(!) times yesterday and today. All
> separate submissions!
> 
> ;-(
> 

Sorry, I've been testing them and monitoring LKML to check for leakages. 
  I certainly did not intend for any of those test sends to get out. 
And I don't understand right now how they did.  I am using sendmail in 
it's basic form and you or anyone else was not on the recipient list.

(Honestly, if I had known they got out, I would have stopped testing... 
:)  But the latest ones are obviously the "official" submissions, since 
those are the copies that I also have.)  If you accept them upstream, 
I'll quit sending them, I promise... :)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support
  2019-09-10 15:34   ` Mike Travis
@ 2019-09-10 16:40     ` Borislav Petkov
  2019-09-10 16:57       ` Mike Travis
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2019-09-10 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Travis
  Cc: Miguel Ojeda, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin,
	Andrew Morton, Christoph Hellwig, Dimitri Sivanich,
	Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche, Steve Wahl,
	maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT),
	linux-kernel, stable

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 08:34:44AM -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
> Hi,  I'm not conscientiously adding any attachments.  I think what is
> happening is some email readers mistake the '---' to signify an attachment
> follows.  I see the "staple" symbol on some indicating an attachment, but
> not usually all of the email I send.  Thanks, Mike

Btw, is there anyway to fix your mail setup and not flood with your
patchset?

I have received your V2 patchset 5(!) times yesterday and today. All
separate submissions!

;-(

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support
  2019-09-10 12:07 ` Miguel Ojeda
@ 2019-09-10 15:34   ` Mike Travis
  2019-09-10 16:40     ` Borislav Petkov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mike Travis @ 2019-09-10 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Miguel Ojeda
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov, Christoph Hellwig, Dimitri Sivanich,
	Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche, Steve Wahl,
	maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT),
	linux-kernel, stable



On 9/10/2019 5:07 AM, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 3:50 PM Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com> wrote:
>>
>> These patches support upcoming UV systems that do not have a UV HUB.
> 
> Please send patches as plain text without attachments. See:
> 
>    https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#no-mime-no-links-no-compression-no-attachments-just-plain-text
> 
> for details.
> 
> Cheers,
> Miguel
> 

Hi,  I'm not conscientiously adding any attachments.  I think what is 
happening is some email readers mistake the '---' to signify an 
attachment follows.  I see the "staple" symbol on some indicating an 
attachment, but not usually all of the email I send.  Thanks, Mike

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support
  2019-09-05 13:02 Mike Travis
@ 2019-09-10 12:07 ` Miguel Ojeda
  2019-09-10 15:34   ` Mike Travis
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Miguel Ojeda @ 2019-09-10 12:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Travis
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov, Christoph Hellwig, Dimitri Sivanich,
	Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche, Steve Wahl,
	maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT),
	linux-kernel, stable

On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 3:50 PM Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com> wrote:
>
> These patches support upcoming UV systems that do not have a UV HUB.

Please send patches as plain text without attachments. See:

  https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#no-mime-no-links-no-compression-no-attachments-just-plain-text

for details.

Cheers,
Miguel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support
  2019-09-05 19:08   ` Mike Travis
@ 2019-09-05 19:14     ` Thomas Gleixner
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2019-09-05 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Travis
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton, Borislav Petkov,
	Christoph Hellwig, Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson,
	Hedi Berriche, Steve Wahl, x86, linux-kernel, stable

On Thu, 5 Sep 2019, Mike Travis wrote:
> On 9/5/2019 12:02 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Mike,
> > 
> > On Thu, 5 Sep 2019, Mike Travis wrote:
> > 
> > > These patches support upcoming UV systems that do not have a UV HUB.
> > > 
> > > 	* Save OEM_ID from ACPI MADT probe
> > > 	* Return UV Hubless System Type
> > > 	* Add return code to UV BIOS Init function
> > > 	* Setup UV functions for Hubless UV Systems
> > > 	* Add UV Hubbed/Hubless Proc FS Files
> > > 	* Decode UVsystab Info
> > > 	* Account for UV Hubless in is_uvX_hub Ops
> > 
> > Can you please in future mark the next version of a patch or patch series
> > with [PATCH V2 n/M] so its clear that this is something different and also
> > add a quick summary what changed vs. V1? Adding to each patch which changed
> > a short change info _after_ the '---' discard line is also good practice
> > and helps reviewers to figure out which part needs to be looked at.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > 	tglx
> > 
> 
> Yeah, I noticed that the V2: tag for the removal that Greg requested was
> missing in the copy sent to me.  Sorry I didn't catch that earlier.
> 
> The "[PATCH V2 n/M]" is something I hadn't been aware but I am now.
> 
> Should I resend the patches again with those updates?

No, please provide a summary of changes as a reply to the cover letter and
point out which patches were actually changed vs. v1.

Thanks,

	tglx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support
  2019-09-05 19:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2019-09-05 19:08   ` Mike Travis
  2019-09-05 19:14     ` Thomas Gleixner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mike Travis @ 2019-09-05 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton, Borislav Petkov,
	Christoph Hellwig, Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson,
	Hedi Berriche, Steve Wahl, x86, linux-kernel, stable



On 9/5/2019 12:02 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Mike,
> 
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2019, Mike Travis wrote:
> 
>> These patches support upcoming UV systems that do not have a UV HUB.
>>
>> 	* Save OEM_ID from ACPI MADT probe
>> 	* Return UV Hubless System Type
>> 	* Add return code to UV BIOS Init function
>> 	* Setup UV functions for Hubless UV Systems
>> 	* Add UV Hubbed/Hubless Proc FS Files
>> 	* Decode UVsystab Info
>> 	* Account for UV Hubless in is_uvX_hub Ops
> 
> Can you please in future mark the next version of a patch or patch series
> with [PATCH V2 n/M] so its clear that this is something different and also
> add a quick summary what changed vs. V1? Adding to each patch which changed
> a short change info _after_ the '---' discard line is also good practice
> and helps reviewers to figure out which part needs to be looked at.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 	tglx
> 

Yeah, I noticed that the V2: tag for the removal that Greg requested was 
missing in the copy sent to me.  Sorry I didn't catch that earlier.

The "[PATCH V2 n/M]" is something I hadn't been aware but I am now.

Should I resend the patches again with those updates?

Thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support
  2019-09-05 18:47 Mike Travis
@ 2019-09-05 19:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
  2019-09-05 19:08   ` Mike Travis
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2019-09-05 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Travis
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton, Borislav Petkov,
	Christoph Hellwig, Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson,
	Hedi Berriche, Steve Wahl, x86, linux-kernel, stable

Mike,

On Thu, 5 Sep 2019, Mike Travis wrote:

> These patches support upcoming UV systems that do not have a UV HUB.
> 
> 	* Save OEM_ID from ACPI MADT probe
> 	* Return UV Hubless System Type
> 	* Add return code to UV BIOS Init function
> 	* Setup UV functions for Hubless UV Systems
> 	* Add UV Hubbed/Hubless Proc FS Files
> 	* Decode UVsystab Info
> 	* Account for UV Hubless in is_uvX_hub Ops

Can you please in future mark the next version of a patch or patch series
with [PATCH V2 n/M] so its clear that this is something different and also
add a quick summary what changed vs. V1? Adding to each patch which changed
a short change info _after_ the '---' discard line is also good practice
and helps reviewers to figure out which part needs to be looked at.

Thanks

	tglx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support
@ 2019-09-05 18:47 Mike Travis
  2019-09-05 19:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mike Travis @ 2019-09-05 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov, Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche, Steve Wahl, x86,
	linux-kernel, stable


These patches support upcoming UV systems that do not have a UV HUB.

	* Save OEM_ID from ACPI MADT probe
	* Return UV Hubless System Type
	* Add return code to UV BIOS Init function
	* Setup UV functions for Hubless UV Systems
	* Add UV Hubbed/Hubless Proc FS Files
	* Decode UVsystab Info
	* Account for UV Hubless in is_uvX_hub Ops

-- 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support
@ 2019-09-05 13:02 Mike Travis
  2019-09-10 12:07 ` Miguel Ojeda
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mike Travis @ 2019-09-05 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton,
	Borislav Petkov, Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Dimitri Sivanich, Russ Anderson, Hedi Berriche, Steve Wahl, x86,
	linux-kernel, stable


These patches support upcoming UV systems that do not have a UV HUB.

	* Save OEM_ID from ACPI MADT probe
	* Return UV Hubless System Type
	* Add return code to UV BIOS Init function
	* Setup UV functions for Hubless UV Systems
	* Add UV Hubbed/Hubless Proc FS Files
	* Decode UVsystab Info
	* Account for UV Hubless in is_uvX_hub Ops

-- 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-09-10 16:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-09-03  0:18 [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support Mike Travis
2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86/platform/uv: Save OEM_ID from ACPI MADT probe Mike Travis
2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86/platform/uv: Return UV Hubless System Type Mike Travis
2019-09-03  6:49   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-09-03 14:12     ` Mike Travis
2019-09-03 15:41       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-09-03 18:49         ` Mike Travis
2019-09-04  6:50           ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86/platform/uv: Add return code to UV BIOS Init function Mike Travis
2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86/platform/uv: Setup UV functions for Hubless UV Systems Mike Travis
2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86/platform/uv: Add UV Hubbed/Hubless Proc FS Files Mike Travis
2019-09-03  6:50   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86/platform/uv: Decode UVsystab Info Mike Travis
2019-09-03  6:22   ` Greg KH
2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86/platform/uv: Check EFI Boot to set reboot type Mike Travis
2019-09-03  0:18 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86/platform/uv: Account for UV Hubless in is_uvX_hub Ops Mike Travis
2019-09-03 16:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-09-03 18:58     ` Mike Travis
2019-09-03 19:03       ` Mike Travis
2019-09-04  6:52       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-09-04 10:18         ` Mike Travis
2019-09-03  7:47 ` [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support Ingo Molnar
2019-09-03 14:17   ` Mike Travis
2019-09-05  8:19     ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-05 13:02 Mike Travis
2019-09-10 12:07 ` Miguel Ojeda
2019-09-10 15:34   ` Mike Travis
2019-09-10 16:40     ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-10 16:57       ` Mike Travis
2019-09-05 18:47 Mike Travis
2019-09-05 19:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-05 19:08   ` Mike Travis
2019-09-05 19:14     ` Thomas Gleixner

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).