Re: [PATCH 26/26] Docs/x86/sgx: Add description for cgroup support

[Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>]

On 11/12/22 01:35, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/x86/sgx.rst b/Documentation/x86/sgx.rst
> index 2bcbffacbed5..f6ca5594dcf2 100644
> --- a/Documentation/x86/sgx.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/x86/sgx.rst
> @@ -300,3 +300,80 @@ to expected failures and handle them as follows:
>     first call.  It indicates a bug in the kernel or the userspace client
>     if any of the second round of ``SGX_IOC_VEPC_REMOVE_ALL`` calls has
>     a return code other than 0.
> +
> +
> +Cgroup Support
> +==============
> +
> +The "sgx_epc" resource within the Miscellaneous cgroup controller regulates
> +distribution of SGX EPC memory, which is a subset of system RAM that
> +is used to provide SGX-enabled applications with protected memory,
> +and is otherwise inaccessible, i.e. shows up as reserved in
> +/proc/iomem and cannot be read/written outside of an SGX enclave.
> +
> +Although current systems implement EPC by stealing memory from RAM,
> +for all intents and purposes the EPC is independent from normal system
> +memory, e.g. must be reserved at boot from RAM and cannot be converted
> +between EPC and normal memory while the system is running.  The EPC is
> +managed by the SGX subsystem and is not accounted by the memory
> +controller.  Note that this is true only for EPC memory itself, i.e.
> +normal memory allocations related to SGX and EPC memory, e.g. the
> +backing memory for evicted EPC pages, are accounted, limited and
> +protected by the memory controller.
> +
> +Much like normal system memory, EPC memory can be overcommitted via
> +virtual memory techniques and pages can be swapped out of the EPC
> +to their backing store (normal system memory allocated via shmem).
> +The SGX EPC subsystem is analogous to the memory subsytem, and
> +it implements limit and protection models for EPC memory.
> +
> +SGX EPC Interface Files
> +-----------------------
> +
> +For a generic description of the Miscellaneous controller interface
> +files, please see Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> +
> +All SGX EPC memory amounts are in bytes unless explicitly stated
> +otherwise.  If a value which is not PAGE_SIZE aligned is written,
> +the actual value used by the controller will be rounded down to
> +the closest PAGE_SIZE multiple.
> +
> +  misc.capacity
> +        A read-only flat-keyed file shown only in the root cgroup.
> +        The sgx_epc resource will show the total amount of EPC
> +        memory available on the platform.
> +
> +  misc.current
> +        A read-only flat-keyed file shown in the non-root cgroups.
> +        The sgx_epc resource will show the current active EPC memory
> +        usage of the cgroup and its descendants. EPC pages that are
> +        swapped out to backing RAM are not included in the current count.
> +
> +  misc.max
> +        A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
> +        cgroups. The sgx_epc resource will show the EPC usage
> +        hard limit. The default is "max".
> +
> +        If a cgroup's EPC usage reaches this limit, EPC allocations,
> +        e.g. for page fault handling, will be blocked until EPC can
> +        be reclaimed from the cgroup.  If EPC cannot be reclaimed in
> +        a timely manner, reclaim will be forced, e.g. by ignoring LRU.
> +
> +  misc.events
> +	A read-write flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
> +	Writes to the file reset the event counters to zero.  A value
> +	change in this file generates a file modified event.
> +
> +	  max
> +		The number of times the cgroup has triggered a reclaim
> +		due to its EPC usage approaching (or exceeding) its max
> +		EPC boundary.
> +
> +Migration
> +---------
> +
> +Once an EPC page is charged to a cgroup (during allocation), it
> +remains charged to the original cgroup until the page is released
> +or reclaimed.  Migrating a process to a different cgroup doesn't
> +move the EPC charges that it incurred while in the previous cgroup
> +to its new cgroup.

The doc LGTM, thanks.

Reviewed-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara