linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, brauner@kernel.org, bvanassche@acm.org,
	dchinner@redhat.com, djwong@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, jack@suse.cz,
	jbongio@google.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com, kbusch@kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, ming.lei@redhat.com,
	ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, sagi@grimberg.me, tytso@mit.edu,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/15] block: Add checks to merging of atomic writes
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 11:20:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <484a449b-5c7e-4766-97d3-36b01c78687c@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240212105444.43262-1-nilay@linux.ibm.com>


>> +
> 
>> +	imask = ~mask;
> 
>> +
> 
>> +	/* Top bits are different, so crossed a boundary */
> 
>> +	if ((start & imask) != (end & imask))
> 
>> +		return true;
> 
>> +
> 
>> +	return false;
> 
>> +}
> 
>> +
> 

I'm not sure what is going on with your mail client here.

> 
> 
> Shall we ensure here that we don't cross max limit of atomic write supported by
> 
> device? It seems that if the boundary size is not advertized by the device
> 
> (in fact, I have one NVMe drive which has boundary size zero i.e. nabo/nabspf/
> 
> nawupf are all zero but awupf is non-zero) then we (unconditionally) allow
> 
> merging. However it may be possible that post merging the total size of the
> 
> request may exceed the atomic-write-unit-max-size supported by the device and
> 
> if that happens then most probably we would be able to catch it very late in
> 
> the driver code (if the device is NVMe).
> 
> 
> 
> So is it a good idea to validate here whether we could potentially exceed
> 
> the atomic-write-max-unit-size supported by device before we allow merging?

Note that we have atomic_write_max_bytes and atomic_write_max_unit_size, 
and they are not always the same thing.

> 
> In case we exceed the atomic-write-max-unit-size post merge then don't allow
> 
> merging?

We check this elsewhere. I just expanded the normal check for max 
request size to cover atomic writes.

Normally we check that a merged request would not exceed max_sectors 
value, and this max_sectors value can be got from 
blk_queue_get_max_sectors().

So if you check a function like ll_back_merge_fn(), we have a merging 
size check:

	if (blk_rq_sectors(req) + bio_sectors(bio) >
	    blk_rq_get_max_sectors(req, blk_rq_pos(req))) {
		req_set_nomerge(req->q, req);
		return 0;
	}

And here the blk_rq_get_max_sectors() -> blk_queue_get_max_sectors() 
call now also supports atomic writes (see patch #7):

@@ -167,7 +167,16 @@ static inline unsigned get_max_io_size(struct bio *bio,
  {
...

+	if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_ATOMIC)
+		max_sectors = lim->atomic_write_max_sectors;
+	else
+		max_sectors = lim->max_sectors;

Note that we do not allow merging of atomic and non-atomic writes.

Thanks,
John

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-12 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-24 11:38 [PATCH v3 00/15] block atomic writes John Garry
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] block: Add atomic write operations to request_queue limits John Garry
2024-02-13  6:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] block: Limit atomic writes according to bio and queue limits John Garry
2024-02-13  4:33   ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-02-13  8:05     ` John Garry
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] fs/bdev: Add atomic write support info to statx John Garry
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] fs: Add RWF_ATOMIC and IOCB_ATOMIC flags for atomic write support John Garry
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] block: Add REQ_ATOMIC flag John Garry
2024-02-13  6:24   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] block: Pass blk_queue_get_max_sectors() a request pointer John Garry
2024-02-13  6:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-13  8:15     ` John Garry
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] block: Limit atomic write IO size according to atomic_write_max_sectors John Garry
2024-02-13  6:26   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-13  8:15     ` John Garry
2024-02-14  7:26       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-14  9:24         ` John Garry
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] block: Error an attempt to split an atomic write bio John Garry
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] block: Add checks to merging of atomic writes John Garry
2024-02-12 10:54   ` Nilay Shroff
2024-02-12 11:20     ` John Garry [this message]
2024-02-12 12:01       ` [PATCH " Nilay Shroff
2024-02-12 12:09     ` John Garry
2024-02-13  6:52       ` Nilay Shroff
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] block: Add fops atomic write support John Garry
2024-02-13  9:36   ` Nilay Shroff
2024-02-13  9:58     ` [PATCH " John Garry
2024-02-13 11:08       ` Nilay Shroff
2024-02-13 11:52         ` John Garry
2024-02-14  9:38           ` Nilay Shroff
2024-02-14 11:29             ` John Garry
2024-02-14 11:47               ` Nilay Shroff
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] scsi: sd: Support reading atomic write properties from block limits VPD John Garry
2024-02-13  6:31   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-13  8:16     ` John Garry
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] scsi: sd: Add WRITE_ATOMIC_16 support John Garry
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] scsi: scsi_debug: Atomic write support John Garry
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] nvme: Support atomic writes John Garry
2024-02-13  6:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-13 14:21     ` John Garry
2024-02-14  8:00       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-14  9:21         ` John Garry
2024-02-14 12:27   ` Nilay Shroff
2024-02-14 13:02     ` John Garry
2024-02-14 16:45       ` Nilay Shroff
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] nvme: Ensure atomic writes will be executed atomically John Garry
2024-01-25  0:52   ` Keith Busch
2024-01-25 11:28     ` John Garry
2024-01-29  6:20       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-29  9:36         ` John Garry
2024-01-29 14:39           ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-26  3:50     ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-02-13  6:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-13 14:07     ` John Garry
2024-01-29  6:18 ` [PATCH v3 00/15] block atomic writes Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-29  9:17   ` John Garry
2024-02-06 18:44   ` John Garry
2024-02-10 12:12     ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=484a449b-5c7e-4766-97d3-36b01c78687c@oracle.com \
    --to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jbongio@google.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).