linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eran Liberty <liberty@extricom.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: eran liberty <eran.liberty@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.26] PCI: refuse to re-add a device to a bus upon pci_scan_child_bus()
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:31:25 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <488778FD.1050206@extricom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080722181132.GE7337@parisc-linux.org>

Matthew Wilcox wrote:

> Look at the consequences of calling fixup_resource() twice on the same
> resource:
>
>         res->start = (res->start + offset) & mask;
>         res->end = (res->end + offset) & mask;
>
> You'll add 'offset' to the other resources twice.
>   
Tring to find heads and tails in the code, I dug in. This is what I understand from the overall flow... and my points of interests:

1. pci_scan_child_bus() starts with iterating over all the devfn and scanning for a device with that devfn

drivers/pci/probe.c
1056 unsigned int __devinit pci_scan_child_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
1057 {
1063         /* Go find them, Rover! */
1064         for (devfn = 0; devfn < 0x100; devfn += 8)
1065                 pci_scan_slot(bus, devfn);

2. pci_scan_slot() will continue to scan all the functions that devfn might have to over
drivers/pci/probe.c
1019 int pci_scan_slot(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn)
1020 {
1026         for (func = 0; func < 8; func++, devfn++) {
1029                 dev = pci_scan_single_device(bus, devfn);

3. pci_scan_single_device() will scan / test if this dev is valid.
drivers/pci/probe.c
996 struct pci_dev *__ref pci_scan_single_device(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn)
997 {
998         struct pci_dev *dev;
999 
1000         dev = pci_scan_device(bus, devfn);

and add it. REGARDLESS if it is already on the pci bus list or not.
1001         if (!dev)
1002                 return NULL;
1003 
1004         pci_device_add(dev, bus);
1005 
1006         return dev;
1007 }

This is the first thing that needs to be fixed IMHO.

4. pci_scan_child_bus() will go on to fixup the bus whether it needs fixing or not.
drivers/pci/probe.c
1072         pcibios_fixup_bus(bus);

This might be the second thing that needs amending.

5.  pcibios_fixup_bus(bus) calls _pcibios_fixup_bus which will call fixup_resource() once per a bus resource (in contrast of per device on that bus) and fixes the resources of that bus.
arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c	
784 static void __devinit __pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
785 {
787         struct pci_dev *dev = bus->self;
798                 for (i = 0; i < PCI_BUS_NUM_RESOURCES; ++i) {
833                         fixup_resource(res, dev);
834                 }
835         }
850 }

As you have correctly observed without other changes this would cause trouble on a bus that has resources.
Since i am not pulling the plug on the whole bus just on selected devices I can defensively skip this part

6. Now I should be able to call pci_bus_assign_resources(bus) which will go over all the newly added device and assign resource to them. 

7. Last step I should be able to pci_bus_add_devices(bus) the, now, resource fixed devices.

Steps 6 and 7 are the one I miss most over which my device wont work after being re-born.

Soooo ...

If I really wanted to make it, working my way around the current code, I would have done something like this.

bus = null;
while ((bus = pci_find_next_bus(bus)) != NULL) {
	for (devfn = 0; devfn < 0x100; devfn += 8) {
		for (func = 0; func < 8; func++) {
			struct pci_dev *dev =  <http://liberty/lxr/ident?v=e500-linux-2.6.26-rc4;i=pci_get_slot>pci_get_slot(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn);
			if (dev) 
				continue;
			dev = pci_scan_single_device(bus, devfn);
			if (!dev)
				continue;
			pci_device_add(dev, bus);
		}
	}
        pci_bus_assign_resources(bus);
        pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
}

WOW.... first time for me to code in Mozilla Thunderbird.

Had I was this smart to begin with I would have done exactly that and go home to sleep like a decent person. 
But since we are here, I feel there should be a either correction in the existing code to allow the:
pci_scan_child_bus(bus) -> pci_bus_assign_resources(bus) -> pci_bus_add_devices(bus) sequence.
Or a new helper function to the PCI that does more or less what I have just described.

If you want I can code it, patch it, and rip the glory :)

That was a long one :)

Liberty


  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-23 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-18 14:18 2.6.24-rc4: pci_remove_bus_device() => pci_scan_child_bus() => pci_bus_add_devices bug? Eran Liberty
2008-07-20 10:31 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-rc4] PCI: refuse to re-add a device to a bus upon pci_scan_child_bus() Eran Liberty
2008-07-20 16:48   ` Eran Liberty
2008-07-21 19:18 ` [PATCH 2.6.26] " Eran Liberty
2008-07-21 19:49   ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-22  8:21     ` eran liberty
2008-07-22 11:49       ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-22 13:08         ` Eran Liberty
2008-07-22 13:14         ` Eran Liberty
2008-07-22 14:13           ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-22 15:25             ` Eran Liberty
2008-07-22 16:52               ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-22 17:41                 ` Eran Liberty
2008-07-22 18:11                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-23 18:31                     ` Eran Liberty [this message]
2008-07-27 11:01                       ` Eran Liberty
2008-07-27 15:08                         ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-08-18  8:08 ` ftrace introduces instability into kernel 2.6.27(-rc2,-rc3) Eran Liberty
2008-08-18 15:07   ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-18 15:47     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-18 16:12       ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-18 17:04         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-18 17:21       ` Scott Wood
2008-08-18 18:27         ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-18 18:29           ` Scott Wood
2008-08-19  1:53           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-19  2:28             ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-19  2:39               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-19  2:41                 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-19  2:47                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-19  3:32                     ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-19  3:36                       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-19  4:00                         ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-19 16:47                     ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-19 17:34                       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-19 21:08                         ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-20  9:40                           ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-19 21:47                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-19 23:58                           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-20  1:17                             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-19  2:56                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-19  3:12                   ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-19  4:17                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-20  7:18                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-20 13:14                         ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-20 13:19                           ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-20 13:36                             ` Eran Liberty
2008-08-20 13:43                               ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-20 14:02                                 ` Eran Liberty
2008-08-20 14:55                                   ` Jon Smirl
2008-08-20 15:23                                     ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-20 18:23                                     ` Eran Liberty
2008-08-20 18:33                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-20 15:27                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-20 21:37                                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-20 14:16                           ` Josh Boyer
2008-08-20 14:22                             ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-20 14:50                               ` Josh Boyer
2008-09-15 16:30                                 ` [PATCH 2.6.26] SERIAL DRIVER: Handle Multiple consecutive sysrq from the serial Eran Liberty
2008-09-17 23:46                                   ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-18  6:58                                     ` Eran Liberty
2008-08-20 21:36                           ` ftrace introduces instability into kernel 2.6.27(-rc2,-rc3) Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-20 21:44                             ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-18 18:47         ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-18 18:56           ` Scott Wood
2008-08-18 19:28             ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-18 18:25     ` Eran Liberty
2008-08-18 18:41       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-19  1:54         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-19  9:56         ` Eran Liberty
2008-08-19 13:02           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-19 21:46             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-18 18:50       ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-19 12:09         ` Eran Liberty
2008-08-19 13:05           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-19 14:21             ` Eran Liberty
2008-08-19 14:42               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-19 20:15           ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-20 11:18             ` Eran Liberty
2008-08-20 13:12               ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-19  1:51     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=488778FD.1050206@extricom.com \
    --to=liberty@extricom.com \
    --cc=eran.liberty@gmail.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).