From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
cl@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:11:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48A0B905.20603@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48A0B571.7010903@intel.com>
Kok, Auke wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
>
>>From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
>>Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:33:43 -0500
>>
>>
>>>Maybe what we are seeing is general bloat in kernel execution paths
>>>due to the growth in complexity?
>>
>>It could be, and any kind of analysis into this would be great.
>
>
> perhaps Rick Jones who maintains netperf could enlighten us on some historic
> numbers? he usually seems to be happy to prop up new netperf numbers :)
While this is an excellent opening to talk about how netperf
top-of-trunk can now emit keyword=value results easier (ostensibly) to
put into a database then the regular or even CSV output formats, I
cannot fully exploit it by pointing at a database of results :(
rick jones
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-11 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-11 18:36 tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Christoph Lameter
2008-08-11 18:50 ` Kok, Auke
2008-08-11 18:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-08-11 21:15 ` David Miller
2008-08-11 21:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-08-11 21:50 ` David Miller
2008-08-11 21:56 ` Kok, Auke
2008-08-11 22:11 ` Rick Jones [this message]
2008-08-12 7:11 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-12 18:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-08-12 8:13 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-08-18 2:05 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-08-18 7:53 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-08-19 0:56 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-08-18 14:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-08-18 14:31 ` Ray Lee
2008-08-18 14:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-08-19 1:01 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-08-18 1:48 ` Zhang, Yanmin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48A0B905.20603@hp.com \
--to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).