linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	cl@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:11:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48A0B905.20603@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48A0B571.7010903@intel.com>

Kok, Auke wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
> 
>>From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
>>Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:33:43 -0500
>>
>>
>>>Maybe what we are seeing is general bloat in kernel execution paths
>>>due to the growth in complexity?
>>
>>It could be, and any kind of analysis into this would be great.
> 
> 
> perhaps Rick Jones who maintains netperf could enlighten us on some historic
> numbers? he usually seems to be happy to prop up new netperf numbers :)

While this is an excellent opening to talk about how netperf 
top-of-trunk can now emit keyword=value results easier (ostensibly) to 
put into a database then the regular or even CSV output formats, I 
cannot fully exploit it by pointing at a database of results :(

rick jones

  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-11 22:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-11 18:36 tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Christoph Lameter
2008-08-11 18:50 ` Kok, Auke
2008-08-11 18:56   ` Christoph Lameter
2008-08-11 21:15 ` David Miller
2008-08-11 21:33   ` Christoph Lameter
2008-08-11 21:50     ` David Miller
2008-08-11 21:56       ` Kok, Auke
2008-08-11 22:11         ` Rick Jones [this message]
2008-08-12  7:11     ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-12 18:57       ` Christoph Lameter
2008-08-12  8:13   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-08-18  2:05     ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-08-18  7:53       ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-08-19  0:56         ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-08-18 14:07       ` Christoph Lameter
2008-08-18 14:31         ` Ray Lee
2008-08-18 14:34           ` Christoph Lameter
2008-08-19  1:01         ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-08-18  1:48 ` Zhang, Yanmin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48A0B905.20603@hp.com \
    --to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
    --cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).