linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <corbet@lwn.net>,
	<peterz@infradead.org>, <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: Use static keys for CPU features
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 12:59:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48d10fa1-ee4c-e398-b5ae-9815bf0f18eb@akamai.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473096348-19548-3-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com>

On 09/05/2016 01:25 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> This patch adds static keys transparently for all the cpu_hwcaps
> features by implementing an array of default-false static keys and
> enabling them when detected. The cpus_have_cap() check uses the static
> keys if the feature being checked is a constant, otherwise the compiler
> generates the bitmap test.
>
> Because of the early call to static_branch_enable() via
> check_local_cpu_errata() -> update_cpu_capabilities(), the jump labels
> are initialised in cpuinfo_store_boot_cpu().

Was there a reason the jump_label_init() couldn't be moved
earlier in the common code?

Thanks,

-Jason

>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Suzuki K. Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 14 +++++++++++---
>   arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c      |  3 +++
>   arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c             |  5 +++++
>   3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index 7099f26e3702..c9dfb1e4c435 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
>   #ifndef __ASM_CPUFEATURE_H
>   #define __ASM_CPUFEATURE_H
>   
> +#include <linux/jump_label.h>
> +
>   #include <asm/hwcap.h>
>   #include <asm/sysreg.h>
>   
> @@ -109,6 +111,7 @@ struct arm64_cpu_capabilities {
>   };
>   
>   extern DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_hwcaps, ARM64_NCAPS);
> +extern struct static_key_false cpu_hwcap_keys[ARM64_NCAPS];
>   
>   bool this_cpu_has_cap(unsigned int cap);
>   
> @@ -121,16 +124,21 @@ static inline bool cpus_have_cap(unsigned int num)
>   {
>   	if (num >= ARM64_NCAPS)
>   		return false;
> -	return test_bit(num, cpu_hwcaps);
> +	if (__builtin_constant_p(num))
> +		return static_branch_unlikely(&cpu_hwcap_keys[num]);
> +	else
> +		return test_bit(num, cpu_hwcaps);
>   }
>   
>   static inline void cpus_set_cap(unsigned int num)
>   {
> -	if (num >= ARM64_NCAPS)
> +	if (num >= ARM64_NCAPS) {
>   		pr_warn("Attempt to set an illegal CPU capability (%d >= %d)\n",
>   			num, ARM64_NCAPS);
> -	else
> +	} else {
>   		__set_bit(num, cpu_hwcaps);
> +		static_branch_enable(&cpu_hwcap_keys[num]);
> +	}
>   }
>   
>   static inline int __attribute_const__
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 62272eac1352..919b2d0d68ae 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ unsigned int compat_elf_hwcap2 __read_mostly;
>   
>   DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_hwcaps, ARM64_NCAPS);
>   
> +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_ARRAY_FALSE(cpu_hwcap_keys, ARM64_NCAPS);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_hwcap_keys);
> +
>   #define __ARM64_FTR_BITS(SIGNED, STRICT, TYPE, SHIFT, WIDTH, SAFE_VAL) \
>   	{						\
>   		.sign = SIGNED,				\
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> index d93d43352504..c3c08368a685 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -437,6 +437,11 @@ void __init smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus)
>   void __init smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
>   {
>   	set_my_cpu_offset(per_cpu_offset(smp_processor_id()));
> +	/*
> +	 * Initialise the static keys early as they may be enabled by the
> +	 * cpufeature code.
> +	 */
> +	jump_label_init();
>   	cpuinfo_store_boot_cpu();
>   	save_boot_cpu_run_el();
>   }

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-07 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-05 17:25 [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: Use static keys for CPU features Catalin Marinas
2016-09-05 17:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] jump_labels: Allow array initialisers Catalin Marinas
2016-09-06 18:11   ` Will Deacon
2016-09-06 18:50     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-05 17:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: Use static keys for CPU features Catalin Marinas
2016-09-07 16:59   ` Jason Baron [this message]
2016-09-08 13:40     ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48d10fa1-ee4c-e398-b5ae-9815bf0f18eb@akamai.com \
    --to=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).