From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757388AbYJWQRZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:17:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752888AbYJWQRP (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:17:15 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:43508 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752692AbYJWQRP (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:17:15 -0400 Message-ID: <4900A3C6.1080000@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:18:14 -0700 From: Mike Travis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Rusty Russell , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [bug #2] Re: [PATCH 00/35] cpumask: Replace cpumask_t with struct cpumask References: <20081023020826.051012000@polaris-admin.engr.sgi.com> <20081023125529.GA18327@elte.hu> <20081023142025.GA18804@elte.hu> <200810240201.15037.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <20081023160610.GA8853@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20081023160610.GA8853@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Rusty Russell wrote: > >> On Friday 24 October 2008 01:20:25 Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> Thomas has started a -tip cross-build test, and there's massive >>> cross-build failures as well due to the cpumask changes: >> Yes. linux-next reported the same thing. I've backed out various >> arch changes for this reason. >> >>> it seems to me that this commit is massively borked: >>> >>> 4a792c2: cpumask: make CONFIG_NR_CPUS always valid >> Yep. This is the big one I dropped. There are a few others; Mike is >> just porting the changes across to your tree now. > > guys. I already spent hours integrating the "latest" of this stuff today > and established baseline quality for it on x86. I've dropped 4a792c2 and > pushed out a new tip/cpus4096-v2, please send append-only patches for > the rest of the changes. > > Ingo Ok, no problem. I was integrating in the changes you already made so they would not be dropped. But I'll send "update" patches instead of "replacement" patches if you prefer. Thanks, Mike