From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752671AbdLEIUj (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 5 Dec 2017 03:20:39 -0500
Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]:41505 "EHLO
        mail-wm0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750978AbdLEIUi (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 5 Dec 2017 03:20:38 -0500
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYYqXV43/fOh4eLyDSzISJFBPUp/JioKh4QD2Maa9uMf0hSj6TYN9sGGEfU6aivjtn35HCilg==
Subject: Re: Regression in e1000e since Kernel 4.14.3
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: "rwarsow@gmx.de" <rwarsow@gmx.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
References: <2d4f3853-a81d-d37d-6b1c-5b4416bcb91d@gmx.de>
 <a117fc7c-e65f-7bae-d266-877686af1870@gmail.com>
 <20171205061834.GB1341@kroah.com> <20171205061920.GC1341@kroah.com>
From: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <491f96ed-9394-dd2f-9af8-435159eed347@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 09:20:33 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20171205061920.GC1341@kroah.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 05.12.2017 07:19, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 07:18:34AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:47:10AM +0100, Gabriel C wrote:
>>> On 04.12.2017 23:10, rwarsow@gmx.de wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hallo
>>>>
>>>> someone and I got an regression with e1000e since kernel 4.14.3 and it seems there is 4.14.4 on the way without a fix.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> bug report is here:
>>>>
>>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198047
>>>
>>> ( added stable and netdev to CC )
>>>
>>> Yes I have a box with e1000e and it seems something at least breaks NM after 4.14.3.
>>
>> Again, can people try 4.14.5-rc1?  It should be resolved there.
> 
> Oops, that would be 4.14.4-rc1.  Any why do you say above that is on the
> way without a fix, did you test it?

I didn't tested 4.14.4-rc1 but somone from the bug report tested it and told is not resolved.

I'll fire up an build in a bit and let you know.