linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	"jbeulich@novell.com" <jbeulich@novell.com>,
	"khali@linux-fr.org" <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:08:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <493994B35A117E4F832F97C4719C4C040133090FB4@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314661640-10991-3-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org>

>--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
>@@ -55,17 +55,10 @@ static void __cpuinit early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>        * need the microcode to have already been loaded... so if it is
>        * not, recommend a BIOS update and disable large pages.
 >      */
>-       if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2) {
>-               u32 ucode, junk;
>-
>-               wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
>-               sync_core();
>-               rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, junk, ucode);
>-
>-               if (ucode < 0x20e) {
>-                       printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
>-                       clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
>-               }
>+       if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2 &&
>+           c->microcode < 0x20e) {
>+               printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
>+               clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE); 
>       }

c->microcode is used here BEFORE it's initialized in init_intel() in your patch set [1/3].

Thanks.

-Fenghua

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-30  1:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-29 23:47 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v4 Andi Kleen
2011-08-29 23:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
2011-08-29 23:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2 Andi Kleen
2011-08-30  1:08   ` Yu, Fenghua [this message]
2011-08-30  1:12   ` [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v4 Yu, Fenghua
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-13 22:55 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v7 Andi Kleen
2011-10-13 22:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
2011-10-13  0:46 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v6 Andi Kleen
2011-10-13  0:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
2011-10-13  5:38   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-09-28 23:19 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v5 Andi Kleen
2011-09-28 23:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
2011-07-06 23:57 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v3 Andi Kleen
2011-07-06 23:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
2011-07-11  8:19   ` Jean Delvare
2011-07-01 19:21 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v3 Andi Kleen
2011-07-01 19:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
2011-05-25 19:32 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v2 Andi Kleen
2011-05-25 19:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
2011-05-26  7:39   ` Jean Delvare
2011-05-24 23:03 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision Andi Kleen
2011-05-24 23:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
2011-05-25  6:59   ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=493994B35A117E4F832F97C4719C4C040133090FB4@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).