From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
To: "Sam Ravnborg" <sam@ravnborg.org>, "Al Viro" <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <srostedt@redhat.com>,
"LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"sparclinux" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ftrace breaks sparc64 build
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:39:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49635F17.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090106113543.GS28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
>>> Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> 06.01.09 12:35 >>>
>On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:53:04AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> The others look like a tools side behavioral difference, as I never saw any
>> such. Is this problem sparc32-specific (I tested x86 and ia64 only)? What's
>> the binutils version used?
>
>2.18.50.0.6.
>
>And no, it's not tools side. What it is, AFAICT, is that sparc32 has
>LDFLAGS_vmlinux = -r, which leaves a metric arseload of relocs that
>wouldn't have survived into vmlinux otherwise. Look at .rela__ksymtab
>in .tmp_vmlinux1, for example...
That I think can only be taken care of by disallowing the stripping for that
arch, i.e. adding a negative dependency to the Kconfig option. Or can
anyone think of any other solution?
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-06 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-05 18:19 ftrace breaks sparc64 build Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-05 19:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 19:42 ` [PATCH] sparc: make proces_ver_nack a bit more readable Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 19:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 19:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 20:07 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-05 20:08 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 18:23 ` David Miller
2009-01-05 19:54 ` ftrace breaks sparc64 build Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-05 20:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 21:31 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-05 21:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 22:01 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-05 22:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 23:11 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-01-06 2:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-06 9:36 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-01-06 4:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-06 9:45 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-01-06 18:32 ` David Miller
2009-01-06 18:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-06 19:01 ` David Miller
2009-01-06 19:52 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 20:02 ` David Miller
2009-01-05 20:30 ` [PATCH] module: clean up initialization of variable Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 22:59 ` Harvey Harrison
2009-01-06 1:22 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-06 2:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 19:48 ` ftrace breaks sparc64 build Al Viro
2009-01-05 19:55 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 7:53 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-06 11:35 ` Al Viro
2009-01-06 12:39 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2009-01-06 13:34 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 15:52 ` Al Viro
2009-01-06 18:39 ` David Miller
2009-01-08 9:28 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49635F17.76E4.0078.0@novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).