From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761775AbZAGVVQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:21:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752029AbZAGVVA (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:21:00 -0500 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.179.30]:44812 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756748AbZAGVVA (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:21:00 -0500 Message-ID: <49651CB8.9060900@sgi.com> Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:20:56 -0800 From: Mike Travis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Ingo Molnar , Rusty Russell , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Jack Steiner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] cpumask: more cpumask updates References: <20090107195832.265117000@polaris-admin.engr.sgi.com> <20090107205229.GB4597@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20090107205229.GB4597@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Mike Travis wrote: > >> One big change to irq_desc and a few smaller maintenance type updates. >> >> cpumask: update irq_desc to use cpumask_var_t >> cpumask: Use topology_core_cpumask()/topology_thread_cpumask() >> cpumask: convert misc driver functions >> cpumask: convert drivers/net/sfc >> cpumask: convert other misc kernel functions >> >> Based on tip/cpus4096: v2.6.28-5703-g1d1a70e >> >> (Ingo - I added a blank line before the From: part and that seems to >> separate it from the Subject. Hopefully your git-am will still >> recognizes it - I did try a git-am here and it seemed to work ok.) >> >> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis > > Since you have it in a Git tree, why dont you send me a pull request? > > I might be more picky about pull requests in general (because it's harder > to fix up a pulled tree than to fix up commits that come from emails - and > it's also more work for you if i refuse to pull than if i have some > comments over email-patches), but it's a much better (more scalable) > workflow in the long run than the email path. > > Ingo Ok, will do. Thanks, Mike