From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758326AbZBKSxB (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:53:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756781AbZBKSww (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:52:52 -0500 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:40295 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752567AbZBKSww (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:52:52 -0500 Message-ID: <49931E54.7000305@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:52:04 -0800 From: Yinghai Lu User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Morten P.D. Stevens" CC: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: warning in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c:400 with 2.6.29-rc3 on IBM x3400 References: <20090209234528.GA862@elte.hu> <4990E90D.30005@kernel.org> <86802c440902101052m223792ddi43d27423844b1d5b@mail.gmail.com> <4991E752.8010903@kernel.org> <86802c440902102106o54e4ea2fua4d108c8564ff8a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Morten P.D. Stevens wrote: > Hi, > >> so there is some problem with your BIOS, please ask the vendor to >> provide one to make >> 2.6.24 happy. > > I'll report the issue to the IBM support. > > on our IBM x3400 servers running RHEL the same output: > > 2.6.18-92.1.10.el5 # > > reg00: base=0xc0000000 (3072MB), size=1024MB: uncachable, count=1 > reg01: base=0x00000000 ( 0MB), size=4096MB: write-back, count=1 > reg02: base=0x100000000 (4096MB), size=1024MB: write-back, count=1 > reg03: base=0xbff80000 (3071MB), size=196608MB: uncachable, count=1 so that bios need to be fixed too. > > and in dmesg: > > mtrr: type mismatch for d0000000,1000000 old: uncachable new: > write-combining want add one entry for xwindow with your display card. > > > Is this a big problem for direct usage? The performance on these servers > is still fine...? x window could be some slow. YH