From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1756642AbZDDS4k@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756642AbZDDS4k (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sat, 4 Apr 2009 14:56:40 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753154AbZDDS42
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 4 Apr 2009 14:56:28 -0400
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:62957 "EHLO
	moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752406AbZDDS41 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 4 Apr 2009 14:56:27 -0400
Message-ID: <49D7AD54.4060408@vlnb.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 22:56:20 +0400
From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@vlnb.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
CC: scst-devel <scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
       iscsitarget-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, stgt@vger.kernel.org,
       James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Subject: [ANNOUNCE]: Comparison of features sets between different SCSI targets
 (SCST, STGT, IET, LIO)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+S6UgRvG3y38mAuHbZPJT8KsJlJURaAGij9o3
 dQm/R4pCu93escj8h5Faa9b9OBHIiyTujsomtzI5qwnGvuAzQ0
 eKQ6dq7/77E5JixL6ZL5g==
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi All,

I set up http://scst.sourceforge.net/comparison.html page, which 
compares features of existing SCSI target subsystems for Linux. The 
comparison includes SCST, STGT, IET and LIO.

I might be not fully correct somewhere, so, if you don't agree with me 
about some item(s) in the comparison table, please let me know and I 
will fix that.

Vlad