From: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>
To: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@vlnb.net>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
iscsitarget-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
scst-devel <scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
stgt@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] [ANNOUNCE]: Comparison of features sets between different SCSI targets (SCST, STGT, IET, LIO)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:07:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49E46E73.8020703@wpkg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49DE4243.5060004@vlnb.net>
Vladislav Bolkhovitin schrieb:
>> Could anyone recheck if it's the same on some other system?
>>
>>> Which IO scheduler on the target did you use? I guess, deadline? If
>>> so, you should try with CFQ as well.
>>
>> I used CFQ.
>
> You didn't apply io_context-XXX.patch, correct? With it you should see a
> noticeable increase, like in http://scst.sourceforge.net/vl_res.txt.
I didn't apply this one.
I used 2.6.26.x kernel and io_context-XXX.patch was for 2.6.27, 2.6.28
and 2.6.29 only; 2.6.27 fails to apply to 2.6.26.8 kernel (perhaps in a
trivial way, I didn't check).
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-14 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-04 18:56 [ANNOUNCE]: Comparison of features sets between different SCSI targets (SCST, STGT, IET, LIO) Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2009-04-04 19:12 ` [Scst-devel] " Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-04-04 19:21 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2009-04-06 9:44 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-04-05 11:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2009-04-06 10:29 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-04-06 10:40 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-04-06 16:55 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2009-04-06 18:27 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-04-07 20:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2009-04-09 18:45 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2009-04-14 11:07 ` Tomasz Chmielewski [this message]
2009-04-14 18:10 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2009-04-06 19:01 ` Bart Van Assche
2009-04-06 19:05 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
[not found] ` <c9a3e4540904052019o3c89128eq52d9046fef7e2725@mail.gmail.com>
2009-04-06 7:32 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
[not found] ` <c9a3e4540904060057w75b5525an9c63486ed00ca9a5@mail.gmail.com>
2009-04-06 12:21 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
[not found] ` <c9a3e4540904060319l3c885641k1217fba468f1fcf8@mail.gmail.com>
2009-04-06 17:57 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49E46E73.8020703@wpkg.org \
--to=mangoo@wpkg.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@gmail.com \
--cc=iscsitarget-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stgt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vst@vlnb.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).