From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>,
davej@redhat.com, trenn@suse.de, linux@dominikbrodowski.net,
mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [-v2 PATCH 2/6] powernow-k8: Add core performance boost support
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:42:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BB2EEE1.4010904@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100330233851.17370621.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On 03/30/2010 08:38 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> I've unilaterally decided that all six patches should be merged via the
> x86 tree, btw. They could be split between x86 and cpufreq, but I
> suspect there are interdependencies which would make that hard.
>
I would agree with that. I'll try to get them in tomorrow.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-31 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-26 13:39 [-v2 PATCH 0/6] powernow-k8: Core Performance Boost and effective frequency support Borislav Petkov
2010-03-26 13:39 ` [-v2 PATCH 1/6] x86, cpu: Add AMD core boosting feature flag to /proc/cpuinfo Borislav Petkov
2010-03-26 13:39 ` [-v2 PATCH 2/6] powernow-k8: Add core performance boost support Borislav Petkov
2010-03-30 22:42 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-31 6:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-31 3:22 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-31 6:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-31 3:38 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-31 6:42 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2010-03-31 15:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-31 15:16 ` Dave Jones
2010-04-09 20:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-09 20:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-08 9:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-26 13:39 ` [-v2 PATCH 3/6] x86: Unify APERF/MPERF support Borislav Petkov
2010-03-26 13:39 ` [-v2 PATCH 4/6] cpufreq: Add APERF/MPERF support for AMD processors Borislav Petkov
2010-03-26 13:39 ` [-v2 PATCH 5/6] powernow-k8: Fix frequency reporting Borislav Petkov
2010-03-26 13:40 ` [-v2 PATCH 6/6] cpufreq: Unify sysfs attribute definition macros Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BB2EEE1.4010904@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).