From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752469Ab0DJXqP (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Apr 2010 19:46:15 -0400 Received: from smtpout2.superonline.com ([212.252.122.228]:62955 "EHLO smtpout2.superonline.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752330Ab0DJXqO (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Apr 2010 19:46:14 -0400 Message-ID: <4BC10DBB.70205@superonline.com> Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 19:46:03 -0400 From: "M. Vefa Bicakci" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100405 Icedove/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Chris Wilson Subject: [Bug #15585] [Bisected Regression in 2.6.32.8] i915 with KMS enabledcauses memorycorruption when resuming from suspend-to-disk References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SMTP-Filter: SurGATE SMTP Filter Engine Release 2.1 ($Revision: 165 $) http://www.endersys.com X-SurGATE-Result: Clean (Content eval: -26.00 points) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/04/10 07:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.32 and 2.6.33. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.32 and 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15585 > Subject : [Bisected Regression in 2.6.32.8] i915 with KMS enabled causes memorycorruption when resuming from suspend-to-disk > Submitter : M. Vefa Bicakci > Date : 2010-03-13 5:11 (27 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/d8e0902806c0bd2ccc4f6a267ff52565a3ec933b > Message-ID : <4B9B1E8F.5090806@superonline.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126845754409543&w=2 Dear Rafael J. Wysocki, I tested vanilla 2.6.33.2 and 2.6.34-rc3-git10, and unfortunately both of them *have* this issue. So it looks like the issue has not been resolved yet. Please keep this regression in the list of known regressions. Just to let you know: I am currently running 2.6.33.2 with the above- mentioned commit reverted, and hibernate-thaw cycles work properly. Regards, M. Vefa Bicakci Note: Please include me in the CC list when replying to this e-mail as I am currently not subscribed to the LKML.