From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754603Ab0DZWAA (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:00:00 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49737 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753883Ab0DZV76 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:59:58 -0400 Message-ID: <4BD60CCB.7040907@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:59:39 -0400 From: Rik van Riel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100120 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dominik Brodowski , Dave Jones , Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Fix performance issue with ondemand governor References: <20100418115949.7b743898@infradead.org> <20100426214156.GA32326@redhat.com> <20100426214534.GA5346@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> In-Reply-To: <20100426214534.GA5346@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/26/2010 05:45 PM, Dominik Brodowski wrote: >> given the scheduler changes, these probably make more sense to go >> via one of Ingo's trees ? >> If everyone agrees, feel free to add my Signed-off-by: > > What about the issue Pavel reported and Willy confirmed (regression > on older hardware)? Having a /sys tunable makes sense, especially when running on battery power. I guess that can be introduced as a patch 8/7 :) -- All rights reversed