linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf,hw_breakpoint: Initialize hardware api earlier
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 07:33:10 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CDFE516.3050006@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289684766.2109.326.camel@laptop>

On 11/13/2010 03:46 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 22:37 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>   
>> From: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
>>
>> When using early debugging, the kernel does not initialize the
>> hw_breakpoint API early enough and causes the late initialization of
>> the kernel debugger to fail. The boot arguments are:
>>
>>     earlyprintk=vga ekgdboc=kbd kgdbwait
>>
>> Then simply type "go" at the kdb prompt and boot. The kernel will
>> later emit the message:
>>
>>     kgdb: Could not allocate hwbreakpoints
>>
>> And at that point the kernel debugger will cease to work correctly.
>>
>> The solution is to initialize the hw_breakpoint at the same time that
>> all the other perf call backs are initialized instead of using a
>> core_initcall() initialization which happens well after the kernel
>> debugger can make use of hardware breakpoints.
>>     
>
> How early is it needed? 

The HW breakpoint callback needs to be registered at the same time the
rest of the perf callbacks are registered.  More specifically, the
infrastructure setup needs to be completed before the debugger calls
"register_wide_hw_breakpoint(&attr, NULL)" in arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c.  
After the debugger calls the registration function, from that point on
perf owns the reservation system for all hw break point registers.

> I've got a patch converting the x86 (still need
> to do the other hardware pmus) to early_initcall() instead of random
> places in the arch bringup (notably before the perf core init).
>
>   

This sounds to me like it would be early enough.  I could certainly run
the simple test case in the patch to make sure it still works, if you
point me to your patch(es).  I imagine I should also test the hand off
procedure where the debugger uses the registers directly up until the
point that perf is capable of handling reservations for the hw
breakpoint slots.

Thanks,
Jason.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-14 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-13 21:37 [GIT PULL] hw-breakpoint fixes Frederic Weisbecker
2010-11-13 21:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: Ignore trap bits on single step exceptions Frederic Weisbecker
2010-11-24 20:32   ` Michael Stefaniuc
2010-11-25  7:47     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-11-13 21:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf,hw_breakpoint: Initialize hardware api earlier Frederic Weisbecker
2010-11-13 21:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-14 13:33     ` Jason Wessel [this message]
2010-11-16 21:24       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-18 16:09         ` Jason Wessel
2010-11-18  9:39 ` [GIT PULL] hw-breakpoint fixes Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CDFE516.3050006@windriver.com \
    --to=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).