From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756528Ab1FQDgH (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:36:07 -0400 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:47489 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756428Ab1FQDgE (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:36:04 -0400 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 Message-ID: <4DFACB8A.2020008@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:35:38 +0900 From: KOSAKI Motohiro User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hch@infradead.org CC: david@fromorbit.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/12] Per superblock cache reclaim References: <1306998067-27659-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20110616113321.GA22422@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20110616113321.GA22422@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (2011/06/16 20:33), Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Can we get some comments from the MM folks for patches 1-3? Those look > like some pretty urgent fixes for really dumb shrinker behaviour. Yeah, I'm reviewing today. I'm sorry delayed it. So, generically they are pretty good to me. thanks Dave. So, I have a few minor comments and I'll post it when my review is finished. (Maybe some hour later).