linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>,
	Jan Glauber <jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Xen Devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] jump_label: if a key has already been initialized, don't nop it out
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:58:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E934E5B.3000603@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111010153631.GA2413@redhat.com>

On 10/10/2011 08:36 AM, Jason Baron wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 02:55:35PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
>>
>> If a key has been enabled before jump_label_init() is called, don't
>> nop it out.
>>
>> This removes arch_jump_label_text_poke_early() (which can only nop
>> out a site) and uses arch_jump_label_transform() instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/jump_label.h |    3 ++-
>>  kernel/jump_label.c        |   20 ++++++++------------
>>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/jump_label.h b/include/linux/jump_label.h
>> index 1213e9d..c8fb1b3 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/jump_label.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/jump_label.h
>> @@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ extern void jump_label_lock(void);
>>  extern void jump_label_unlock(void);
>>  extern void arch_jump_label_transform(struct jump_entry *entry,
>>  				 enum jump_label_type type);
>> -extern void arch_jump_label_text_poke_early(jump_label_t addr);
>> +extern void arch_jump_label_transform_early(struct jump_entry *entry,
>> +				 enum jump_label_type type);
>>  extern int jump_label_text_reserved(void *start, void *end);
>>  extern void jump_label_inc(struct jump_label_key *key);
>>  extern void jump_label_dec(struct jump_label_key *key);
>> diff --git a/kernel/jump_label.c b/kernel/jump_label.c
>> index a8ce450..059202d5 100644
>> --- a/kernel/jump_label.c
>> +++ b/kernel/jump_label.c
>> @@ -121,13 +121,6 @@ static void __jump_label_update(struct jump_label_key *key,
>>  	}
>>  }
>>  
>> -/*
>> - * Not all archs need this.
>> - */
>> -void __weak arch_jump_label_text_poke_early(jump_label_t addr)
>> -{
>> -}
>> -
>>  static __init int jump_label_init(void)
>>  {
>>  	struct jump_entry *iter_start = __start___jump_table;
>> @@ -139,12 +132,15 @@ static __init int jump_label_init(void)
>>  	jump_label_sort_entries(iter_start, iter_stop);
>>  
>>  	for (iter = iter_start; iter < iter_stop; iter++) {
>> -		arch_jump_label_text_poke_early(iter->code);
>> -		if (iter->key == (jump_label_t)(unsigned long)key)
>> +		struct jump_label_key *iterk;
>> +
>> +		iterk = (struct jump_label_key *)(unsigned long)iter->key;
>> +		arch_jump_label_transform(iter, jump_label_enabled(iterk) ?
>> +					  JUMP_LABEL_ENABLE : JUMP_LABEL_DISABLE);
>> +		if (iterk == key)
>>  			continue;
>>  
>> -		key = (struct jump_label_key *)(unsigned long)iter->key;
>> -		atomic_set(&key->enabled, 0);
>> +		key = iterk;
>>  		key->entries = iter;
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
>>  		key->next = NULL;
>> @@ -212,7 +208,7 @@ void jump_label_apply_nops(struct module *mod)
>>  		return;
>>  
>>  	for (iter = iter_start; iter < iter_stop; iter++)
>> -		arch_jump_label_text_poke_early(iter->code);
>> +		arch_jump_label_transform(iter, JUMP_LABEL_DISABLE);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static int jump_label_add_module(struct module *mod)
>> -- 
>> 1.7.6.2
>>
> Hi,
>
> I just realized that the early call to jump_label_inc(), isn't being
> honored with this patch until later when we invoke jump_label_init().
> That strikes me as being inconsistent. When jump_label_inc() returns we
> should expect the branch to be updated.

Why is that?  It looks to me like it will unconditionally update the
instruction, irrespective of whether _init() has been called?

> Thus, I think what probably want is to add a new 'int jump_label_init'
> flag. If its not set we can call 'jump_label_init()' from
> jump_label_inc()/dec().

Hm.  I worry that it may end up calling jump_label_init() in an
unexpected context, especially since it may well be config-dependent, or
adding a jump_label_inc() later on starts mysteriously failing.

>  And jump_label_init() can avoid initialization
> if its already set.

That doesn't seem worthwhile in itself.  I suspect the number of "early"
jump_label_incs will be very small (or we should look at doing the init
earlier).

    J

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-10 19:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-01 21:55 [PATCH RFC V2 0/5] jump-label: allow early jump_label_enable() Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-01 21:55 ` [PATCH RFC V2 1/5] jump_label: use proper atomic_t initializer Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-01 21:55 ` [PATCH RFC V2 2/5] stop_machine: make stop_machine safe and efficient to call early Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-02  0:36   ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-03 19:24   ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-10-01 21:55 ` [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] jump_label: if a key has already been initialized, don't nop it out Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-03 15:02   ` Jason Baron
2011-10-03 15:47     ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-03 16:27     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-04 14:10       ` Jason Baron
2011-10-04 15:18         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-04 16:30         ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-04 17:53           ` Jason Baron
2011-10-04 18:05             ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-06  0:16           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-06  0:17             ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-06  0:47               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-06 17:53               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-06 18:10                 ` Jason Baron
2011-10-06 18:13                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-06 21:39                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-06 22:08                       ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-06 18:15                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-06 18:33                     ` Jason Baron
2011-10-06 18:35                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-06 18:43                         ` Jason Baron
2011-10-06 18:26                   ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-06 18:29                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-06 18:38                       ` Jason Baron
2011-10-06 19:34                         ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-06 20:33                           ` Jason Baron
2011-10-06 20:45                             ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-06 18:50                     ` Richard Henderson
2011-10-06 19:28                       ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-06 21:42                         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-06 22:06                           ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-06 22:10                             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-06 22:20                               ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-07 17:09                               ` [PATCH][RFC] jump_labels/x86: Use either 5 byte or 2 byte jumps Steven Rostedt
2011-10-07 18:52                                 ` Jason Baron
2011-10-07 19:21                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-07 21:48                                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-07 22:00                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-07 22:03                                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-07 19:33                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-07 19:40                                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-07 19:58                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-07 20:04                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-10 15:36   ` [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] jump_label: if a key has already been initialized, don't nop it out Jason Baron
2011-10-10 19:58     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2011-10-10 20:10       ` Jason Baron
2011-10-01 21:55 ` [PATCH RFC V2 4/5] x86/jump_label: drop arch_jump_label_text_poke_early() Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-01 21:55 ` [PATCH RFC V2 5/5] sparc/jump_label: " Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E934E5B.3000603@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
    --cc=jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).