archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Ferre <>
To: Jamie Iles <>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <>,,,
	Arnd Bergmann <>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the at91 tree with the arm-soc tree
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:47:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111124095603.GA5048@totoro>

On 11/24/2011 10:56 AM, Jamie Iles :
> Hi Stephen,
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:16:11PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Today's linux-next merge of the at91 tree got conflicts in
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-cap9adk.c, arch/arm/mach-at91/board-cpu9krea.c,
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-cpuat91.c,
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-snapper9260.c and
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h between commit 84e0cdb0a262
>> ("macb: unify at91 and avr32 platform data") from the arm-soc tree and
>> commit 1509f4847dd1 ("at91/boards: use -EINVAL for invalid gpio") from
>> the at91 tree.
>> I fixed them up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
>> However, it looks to me that struct macb_platform_data (in
>> include/linux/platform_data/macb.h) will need its phy_irq_pin members
>> changed to int as well (which may have other consequences).
> That looks correct to me.  I've just posted a patch to convert 
> phy_irq_pin to an int and from inspection that shouldn't break anything 
> by itself.

Good, I will Acknowledge it.

> The macb driver doesn't currently use the phy_irq_pin member, but the 
> at91_ether driver does and that compares to 0 for no IRQ so the 
> assignment of -EINVAL _could_.

Yes indeed, I have a patch to address that and I send it now. However, I
guess that this will go on top of Jean-Christophe's gpio patch series.

Best regards,
Nicolas Ferre

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-24 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-24  1:16 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-24  9:56 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-24 10:47   ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2015-05-20  0:08 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-20  7:41 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-07-30 22:38 Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-31  7:09 ` Nicolas Ferre
2017-04-19 22:38 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-20 14:50 ` Nicolas.Ferre
2017-06-04 23:48 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: linux-next: manual merge of the at91 tree with the arm-soc tree' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).