From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752218Ab1LSCiS (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:38:18 -0500 Received: from serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp ([222.151.198.100]:53444 "EHLO serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752053Ab1LSCiP (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:38:15 -0500 Message-ID: <4EEEA3D0.9070703@oss.ntt.co.jp> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:39:12 +0900 From: Takuya Yoshikawa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111103 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Xiao Guangrong CC: Avi Kivity , Marcelo Tosatti , LKML , KVM Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] KVM: MMU: do not add a nonpresent spte to rmaps of its child References: <4EEB19AF.5070501@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4EEB1A41.7090902@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <4EEB1A41.7090902@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (2011/12/16 19:15), Xiao Guangrong wrote: > -static void mmu_page_add_parent_pte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > - struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, u64 *parent_pte) > +static void mmu_page_add_set_parent_pte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > + struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, > + u64 *parent_pte) > { > if (!parent_pte) > return; > > + mmu_spte_set(parent_pte, __pa(sp->spt) | SHADOW_PAGE_TABLE); > pte_list_add(vcpu, parent_pte,&sp->parent_ptes); > } There are a few prefixes in the kvm mmu code. e.g. mmu_page_, kvm_mmu_, kvm_mmu_page_, ... Sometimes we also use "sp". How about deciding a consistent way from now on? E.g. if the function is static and for local use only, such a prefix can be eliminated, if it is used outside of mmu.c, kvm_mmu_ is needed, we use sp for kvm_mmu_page, ... (just an example) Takuya