From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755808Ab2AIR5w (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:57:52 -0500 Received: from usmamail.tilera.com ([206.83.70.75]:24574 "EHLO USMAMAIL.TILERA.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751988Ab2AIR5v (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:57:51 -0500 Message-ID: <4F0B2A9D.5020208@tilera.com> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:57:49 -0500 From: Chris Metcalf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gilad Ben-Yossef CC: , Christoph Lameter , Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , , Pekka Enberg , Matt Mackall , Sasha Levin , Rik van Riel , Andi Kleen , Mel Gorman , Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , Avi Kivity , Michal Nazarewicz , Kosaki Motohiro Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] Reduce cross CPU IPI interference References: <1326040026-7285-1-git-send-email-gilad@benyossef.com> In-Reply-To: <1326040026-7285-1-git-send-email-gilad@benyossef.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/8/2012 11:26 AM, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: > We have lots of infrastructure in place to partition a multi-core systems > such that we have a group of CPUs that are dedicated to specific task: > cgroups, scheduler and interrupt affinity and cpuisol boot parameter. > Still, kernel code will some time interrupt all CPUs in the system via IPIs > for various needs. These IPIs are useful and cannot be avoided altogether, > but in certain cases it is possible to interrupt only specific CPUs that > have useful work to do and not the entire system. > > This patch set, inspired by discussions with Peter Zijlstra and Frederic > Weisbecker when testing the nohz task patch set, is a first stab at trying > to explore doing this by locating the places where such global IPI calls > are being made and turning a global IPI into an IPI for a specific group > of CPUs. The purpose of the patch set is to get feedback if this is the > right way to go for dealing with this issue and indeed, if the issue is > even worth dealing with at all. Based on the feedback from this patch set > I plan to offer further patches that address similar issue in other code > paths. > > The patch creates an on_each_cpu_mask and on_each_cpu_conf infrastructure > API (the former derived from existing arch specific versions in Tile and > Arm) and and uses them to turn several global IPI invocation to per CPU > group invocations. Acked-by: Chris Metcalf (To be fair, mostly this acks the proposed infrastructure, and moving the functions out of the tile architecture and into the generic code; I not expert enough at slub or the invalidate_bh_lrus path to ack those changes, other than to say I like how they look.) -- Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp. http://www.tilera.com